Jump to content

Oooh he's nice - I'll vote for him......I think.


Recommended Posts

Apparently women are the most likely to be floating voters and also more likely to have a late change of mind on whom they might vote for.


Hence they are being targeted by all parties.


This election may be won and lost on Mumsnet.....



Disclaimer - This not my view, but the view of the BBC. (So don't shout at me)

I believe women quite rightly don't rush into these decisions. Also they don't necessarily have entrenched political views, hence they are fully entitled to take their time to decide.


Some people think they take longer to understand the issues and then just run out of time, but I don't agree with that, at all.

Oh. Ok then. You probably know best. You're right. I thought I was fine, and just having an interesting chat about politics, but I see now that I was in fact cross and should, as you say, stop. I do need more time to make up my mind. Do tell me, which tv channel should I be watching?

ok the OP was a prompt - it was the bbc's view on the news tonight - do you disagree with this research?




My personal view is that women are (in my experience) less interested in politics than men, possibly because they are less self interested and are primarily less driven by monetary matters than men and are more satisfied by personal and family matters, none of which can be generally influenced by government. They are probably fairer and more accepting, and maybe less demanding of government.

I don't know if I disagree with the research, it's not something I've really thought about. I am not sure I agree that government doesn't affect family matters though - child trust fund? Government funded childcare? State school system/national curriculum? No fault divorce? Child support agency? Maternity rights? Paternity rights? Flexible working legislation?
"monetary matters and are more satisfied by personal and family matters, none of which can be generally influenced by government. They are probably fairer and more accepting, maybe less demanding of government." most women run family budgets/household cash flows. i think women are very motivated, like most people, by issues that affect them.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wot legalb said and, Mick, if you'd actuallly

> listened to the piece on the BBC rather than

> rushing on here you'd have heard the conclusion

> was very much as LBs post....blooody men



stop sucking up.....

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My personal view is that women are (in my

> experience) less interested in politics than men,

> possibly because they are less self interested and

> are primarily less driven by monetary matters than

> men and are more satisfied by personal and family

> matters, none of which can be generally influenced

> by government. They are probably fairer and more

> accepting, and maybe less demanding of government.


Gosh Mick Mac - but you'd vote for anyone that ensured a swift return to original formula midget gems? ;)


Katie*$$$$$$$$*1997

eh? you just listed a load of policies.


My point is that men are more greedy. If you read between the lines you would see that. If you want to argue that women are just as greedy and competitive as men then be my guest. Women are more spiritual and family interested, the issues that matter to them are less open to the governance of others.


As for Quids - he is as predicable as ever.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My personal view is that women are (in my

> > experience) less interested in politics than

> men,

> > possibly because they are less self interested

> and

> > are primarily less driven by monetary matters

> than

> > men and are more satisfied by personal and

> family

> > matters, none of which can be generally

> influenced

> > by government. They are probably fairer and

> more

> > accepting, and maybe less demanding of

> government.

>

> Gosh Mick Mac - but you'd vote for anyone that

> ensured a swift return to original formula midget

> gems? ;)

>

> Katie*$$$$$$$$*1997


Midget gems and a decent secondary school for my girls to go to, to prepare them for motherhood.

I'm a woman, and yeh it's true - this time I really don't know who to vote for. But are there not men who also don't know who to vote for??


Apart from a Liberal (sic) blip once and voting SNP when I lived in Scotland, I've always voted Labour in general elections. Green and other stuff in local elections.


And now - ????


Well it deffo won't be Tory, but I dislike (edited from hate) Gordon Brown as a person but his policies seem OK, and I was never anti the Iraq war because all very well looking at things with hindsight, and blah blah blah.


OK I've had too much Brown Brothers Dry Muscat.


And I do remember the euphoria when Labour got in after zillions of years of Tory rule.


:-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...