Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We live in a democracy. If the majority vote results in a decision we don't agree with we have to accept that fact.


Please, no more childish petitions or questioning the result. If youngsters, Londoners and the Scottish voters had turned out in greater numbers Remain would have won.


If these people can't be bothered to get out of bed or brave a bit of rain don't blame 17.4m people.


Enough is enough. What whingers seem to be missing here is the world is in awe of The UK for such a brave defence of democracy/sovereignty in the face of such vested interests.

Hi keano,


Please could you explain what you mean by the expression 'democracy'?


Ideally, you might place your explanation in the context of the central genealogies of the concept by those who have spent lifetimes thinking about it, for example John Dunn (search in Amazon: Dunn, democracy).

Hi Jaywalker,


Without getting into the realms of political philosophy, more than 45m registered to vote in the referendum after a two day extension for late registrants. Around 11.3m of those registered didn't or were unable to vote for whatever reason.


Scotland's turnout was disappointing. The 18-35s vote was disappointing. The turnout in London was disappointing.


To say the result is undemocratic/unfair etc is naive. If you want to blame anyone blame Remain supporters in the above categories.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll 'whinge' as much as I want to thanks and

> apart from Trump and Le Pen..... Who is in awe of

> the stupid out vote based on lies.



Anyone who understands the idea of democracy.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> heartblock Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll 'whinge' as much as I want to thanks and

> > apart from Trump and Le Pen..... Who is in awe

> of

> > the stupid out vote based on lies.

>

>

> Anyone who understands the idea of democracy.



Surely part of living in a democracy is the right to moan about the outcome of you lose?


Especially if it's a close run thing, and it looks like those who won lied to do so?


Or is there a rule that says if you lose you have shut up? Didn't think this was liars poker...

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but I am not going to sit idly whilst Boris

> and co drive this country over a cliff.


We're all worried about the future Loz. Freedom is a scary prospect. You're not going to stand idly. Fair enough. What are you going to do then and contribute to a new dynamic Britain, whinge and talk Britain down or help unleash the potential?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi JoeLeg

>

> It was a very ugly campaign and both sides should

> be ashamed of their exaggerated figures and spin

> (some may say lies).

>

> Personally, I thought the hijacking of Jo Cox's

> tragic death for Remain ends trumped any ?350m a

> week fib.



Well, I do say lies. You can of course disagree, and you're free to call it a 'fib', though I'm also free to say that when you allow the electorate to think that (and we all now they did), it goes a bit beyond a fib.

But then that's the beauty of a democracy, we can hold differing opinions and talk about it, even after the event.


I didn't seech hijack the tragic murder of Jo Cox anywhere; can you provide a link to anything backing that up?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sorry, but I am not going to sit idly whilst

> Boris

> > and co drive this country over a cliff.

>

> What are you going to do then and

> contribute to a new dynamic Britain, whinge and

> talk Britain down or help unleash the potential?



Openly criticising something we disagree with an analysing what's happened is an important part of working out what we think should happen. I don't see Loz talking Britain down (a phrase often used by people when they want to accuse someone of a lack of patriotism or generally not supporting the country; I'm sure that's not what you meant?), looks to me like he's wanting to get it back on what he sees as the right path.


Again, that's democracy for you. Just because we disagree with you doesn't automatically make us wrong. And vice versa.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Personally, I thought the hijacking of Jo Cox's

> tragic death for Remain ends trumped any ?350m a

> week fib.


Didn't happen. People like Katie Hopkins tried to claim it happened, but it just didn't. The only hijacking of that tragic incident was from the extreme right trying to say it had been hijacked. You should be ashamed even to make that claim.

etta166 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you so sure that you understand how democracy

> works in the UK?


I hope so

>

> The U.K. has a parliamentary democracy. The

> electorate send representatives to parliament, and

> they make laws on our behalf. The act of

> Parliament that permitted this referendum did not

> incorporate legislation that made the result of

> the referendum binding. It is, therefore,

> advisory.


Agreed

>

> It would be completely democratic, within the

> rules of the U.K. democracy, for parliament to

> vote on, and reject, invoking Art 50 of the Lisbon

> treaty. It might not be popular, it probably would

> be morally wrong. But it would be democratic.


Agreed if Parliament voted to rescind prior parliamentary agreements on EU legislation, Treaty of Rome, Maastricht etc. Constitutionally, Parliament cannot be bound by laws made by previous Parliaments.

>

> Petitioning your MP, or whinging as you put it,

> about a decision that you don't agree with is also

> a large part of how U.K. democracy works.


Agreed. Although you may be wasting your time.

>

> If we lived in a plebiscite democracy, or had

> proportional representation, then you would be

> correct that a minority simply has to accept a

> majority vote. But that is not the case here.


See replies above.


On your last paragraph, Sorry, you are wrong here. The rules for this referendum were quite clear. yes or no, the most votes win. Most people understood that. Yes, constitutionally the result is advisory. Whoe betide the politicians, like David Lammy, who decide 17.4m voters are wrong and they know what's best for them

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And I thought lies around immigration that may

> have led to a mentally vulnerable man murdering an

> MP equally diplorable.


Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal link here no matter how Remain tried to create one. The man was unfortunately mentally unstable.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And I thought lies around immigration that may

> > have led to a mentally vulnerable man murdering

> an

> > MP equally diplorable.

>

> Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal link

> here no matter how Remain tried to create one. The

> man was unfortunately mentally unstable.


Again, can you provide any links to anything to back that up?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And I thought lies around immigration that may

> > have led to a mentally vulnerable man murdering

> an

> > MP equally diplorable.

>

> Don't be silly blah blah. There is no causal link

> here no matter how Remain tried to create one. The

> man was unfortunately mentally unstable.


He was also involved with Britian First who two weeks before the murder told members that any 'muslims in offical positions, like MPs and Mayors were now enemies of the state'. I think it's clear where his motivation lay and why he selected his local MP. She had publically worked for taking Syrian refugees. You have no way of knowing either if Jo Cox' active local campiagining for remain is what provoked his interest in her. So best not to make assumptions about her murder either way eh - or make claims that the remain camp used her murder for gain when they didn't as well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was planning to come on here to ask if anyone might know which celeb/royal came through Lordship Lane yesterday - was on my way up to Spurs, on bus at the roundabout by the EDT when some whistling police cyclists pulled the traffic to the side of the road to allow a biggish range rover to shoot past, on the way up towards Dog Kennel Hill. Could only make out two, maybe middle-aged, men in the front before it passed. Mildly hysterical lady on pavement was laughing/screeching with her friend that they were desperately trying to find out who it was. Had more reason to post after this lunchtime's experience. Had just got to bus stop opposite the M&S by the station when some mini cooper thing bombed through the traffic, swerving across to cut up another car to get up the hill, before two or three police cars followed about 20 seconds behind. Said mini cooper thing then reappeared coming the other way, beeping its horn to get other cars out the way before it bombed up what I think was Elsie Road, with police cars now on both sides of the road by Maxin trying to stop traffic getting in the way/half the speeding car. Bit more than I had bargained for when I set out/want in local area! Stay careful out there folks, this place is getting scarier...
    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...