Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Over the last week Ive realised that there is a man who seems to be sitting or occasionally lying down mid way accross the open arae on Peckham rye common. At first I assumed he was watching football then I thought he was praying but as I drove past today he was there from what seems to be at least 9am and was still there at 7 pm. As far as i can see he only seems to have a white sheet and a Black bag with him. Its a bit odd as he always seems to be in the same location and im beginning to suspect he is living there. As where he is is so exposed and the weather has been so cold ive become worried about this Has anyone else noticed and if so is he ok ? I wanted to approach him today to check if he needs help but was a bit cowardly in case ive got the wrong end of the stick?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11286-man-on-peckham-rye/
Share on other sites

I checked on him yesterday - he was breathing so I left him!


Think he may be the same chap I saw yesterday afternoon lying on his bag in Gowlett Road. He's quite young (mid 20s), very aggressive and doesn't want any help. Not a lot one can do in that situation.

Hi yes I saw him with a red bag at first initially i thoght it was a teams football kit it was only after the football finished that i realised that it was someone sleeping but as that was the first time I saw him I dint think too much of it. thanks for Info about St Mungos will give it a go as it seems such an odd location ( ie very exposed) I was worried about mental health issues too.

Hi there. I spoke to the guy on Peckham Rye with the black bag and white blanket last Wednesday I think. Gave him some money and food. He said he had somewhere warm to stay at night - a church refuge although I can't remember the name of it.He'd also seen the council I think to try and get housing sorted. Think he was on the common from fairly early - 8:30 a.m. to after six at night.


Sadly haven't seen him since them.


Hoping he's OK.


Good to have thess phone numbers though - so thank you to those who posted them here. Am gong to plug them into phone in case needed in future.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...