Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No need, *Bob*, men aren't defined culturally by fatherhood (mention women to any politician, Theresa May included, and what they'll talk about is childcare) and their bodies don't change when children are born, lucky things.


They don't age well from 40 on, though, so maybe one for men who've lost their hair but are still fanciable - BILF?

How do you know they are not GILFs? Although given that women are starting to breed in their late 30s I suppose they are probably MILFs....up to the ears in nappies etc...they won't have the time for much else- especially since they won't have the energy -being older 'n all, and spending their spare time in the gym.

Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken? and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is enough tension on the sreets without a sexual predator being encouraged.


I thought this site was self policing. The OP is well out of order posting such an inappropriate remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone please clarify is this an ironic

> thread or just good old casual sexism ?


What do you mean, 'just' as though this is somehow excusable? there is no 'just' he is advertising himself

and sounds like a ILIMMB, this isn't amusing, funny or rational, it is creepy and sinister, and uncivilised.


Back to work, disturbed.

Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night

> posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken?

> and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is

> enough tension on the sreets without a sexual

> predator being encouraged.

>

> I thought this site was self policing. The OP is

> well out of order posting such an inappropriate

> remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.


Well said, Elph, I agree.

Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there will be many that will feel sensitive and be offended.

If someone need this then there are other places to engage with people of similar attitude.

I apologize if my [unnecessary] comment caused any offence - it was flip & unthinking.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, EA - do lighten up.

>

> Be riled, if you will... but disturbed is a bit

> strong


I did actually request not to be advised to 'lighten up'


I am disturbed that regular commenters seem to find this acceptable and amusing.


Perhaps I am sensitive but that does not make me wrong.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey, 'sexual predator' is going it a bit.

> Slightly sexist, maybe, but surely a week to try

> to keep a sense of perspective and ration the

> outrage?



I didn't say I was outraged, which smacks of a dowager Duchess clutching her pearls.

Perhaps you do not find this post predatory and creepy but I did which does not make me wrong

or skew my perspective.


And I am astonished that you would excuse a dubious post and criticise mine.

I can't keep up with all these acronyms. Anyway, I'm the wrong side of 50, single and not quite moribund yet (though that's debatable) I'd like to think I haven't been whooped with the ugly stick and have hung on to some of my youthful good looks and virility. This thread has got me thinking it's probably time I took a wife. I'm just not sure whose yet.

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there

> will be many that will feel sensitive and be

> offended.

> If someone need this then there are other places

> to engage with people of similar attitude.

> I apologize if my comment caused any offence - it

> was flip & unthinking.


Thank you for your gracious response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...