Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No need, *Bob*, men aren't defined culturally by fatherhood (mention women to any politician, Theresa May included, and what they'll talk about is childcare) and their bodies don't change when children are born, lucky things.


They don't age well from 40 on, though, so maybe one for men who've lost their hair but are still fanciable - BILF?

How do you know they are not GILFs? Although given that women are starting to breed in their late 30s I suppose they are probably MILFs....up to the ears in nappies etc...they won't have the time for much else- especially since they won't have the energy -being older 'n all, and spending their spare time in the gym.

Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken? and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is enough tension on the sreets without a sexual predator being encouraged.


I thought this site was self policing. The OP is well out of order posting such an inappropriate remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone please clarify is this an ironic

> thread or just good old casual sexism ?


What do you mean, 'just' as though this is somehow excusable? there is no 'just' he is advertising himself

and sounds like a ILIMMB, this isn't amusing, funny or rational, it is creepy and sinister, and uncivilised.


Back to work, disturbed.

Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night

> posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken?

> and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is

> enough tension on the sreets without a sexual

> predator being encouraged.

>

> I thought this site was self policing. The OP is

> well out of order posting such an inappropriate

> remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.


Well said, Elph, I agree.

Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there will be many that will feel sensitive and be offended.

If someone need this then there are other places to engage with people of similar attitude.

I apologize if my [unnecessary] comment caused any offence - it was flip & unthinking.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, EA - do lighten up.

>

> Be riled, if you will... but disturbed is a bit

> strong


I did actually request not to be advised to 'lighten up'


I am disturbed that regular commenters seem to find this acceptable and amusing.


Perhaps I am sensitive but that does not make me wrong.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey, 'sexual predator' is going it a bit.

> Slightly sexist, maybe, but surely a week to try

> to keep a sense of perspective and ration the

> outrage?



I didn't say I was outraged, which smacks of a dowager Duchess clutching her pearls.

Perhaps you do not find this post predatory and creepy but I did which does not make me wrong

or skew my perspective.


And I am astonished that you would excuse a dubious post and criticise mine.

I can't keep up with all these acronyms. Anyway, I'm the wrong side of 50, single and not quite moribund yet (though that's debatable) I'd like to think I haven't been whooped with the ugly stick and have hung on to some of my youthful good looks and virility. This thread has got me thinking it's probably time I took a wife. I'm just not sure whose yet.

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there

> will be many that will feel sensitive and be

> offended.

> If someone need this then there are other places

> to engage with people of similar attitude.

> I apologize if my comment caused any offence - it

> was flip & unthinking.


Thank you for your gracious response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • £14,000 last year which included £500 for scaffolding.
    • Maggie Browning usually very good responding to emails. Roving surgeries - we got a letter some time ago that they were in Barry Road between certain times - but neither neighbours of ourselves saw them. Face to face surgeries rarely held now due to violent attacks on MPS and Councillors.
    • Just for information: I see that the Licensing Sub-committee has the Tesco application as item 1 on their 24 July meeting agenda.  https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=172&MId=8329. The officer's report to the committtee provides a good succinct summary.  I see, from (original) p.31 of the full public pack, (or more conveniently the supporting documents) that Tesco Legal Dept on 12 June reported that they'd agreed with the police's suggested conditions to be attached to the licence, and the police accordingly withdrew their own representation.  That leaves just one representation, from a member of the public, to be dealt with on the day. I still think it's not necessarily to be presumed that Tesco will definitely be taking over the premises.  I see that Poundland themselves were granted an off-sales licence on 21 Feb 2023, and surrendered it on 3 July 2025.  I'm not sure they actually ever used it themselves.  Did they? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Statement of Licensing Policy 2021-2026.pdf is a full statement of the policy and its application, for thems as is interested.
    • I'm now just following David Peckham around, posting laughing emojis on all his comments.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...