Jump to content

East Dulwich

EDMP

By EDMP
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted

No need, *Bob*, men aren't defined culturally by fatherhood (mention women to any politician, Theresa May included, and what they'll talk about is childcare) and their bodies don't change when children are born, lucky things.


They don't age well from 40 on, though, so maybe one for men who've lost their hair but are still fanciable - BILF?

uncleglen

uncleglen

Posted
Posted
How do you know they are not GILFs? Although given that women are starting to breed in their late 30s I suppose they are probably MILFs....up to the ears in nappies etc...they won't have the time for much else- especially since they won't have the energy -being older 'n all, and spending their spare time in the gym.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken? and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is enough tension on the sreets without a sexual predator being encouraged.


I thought this site was self policing. The OP is well out of order posting such an inappropriate remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone please clarify is this an ironic

> thread or just good old casual sexism ?


What do you mean, 'just' as though this is somehow excusable? there is no 'just' he is advertising himself

and sounds like a ILIMMB, this isn't amusing, funny or rational, it is creepy and sinister, and uncivilised.


Back to work, disturbed.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night

> posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken?

> and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is

> enough tension on the sreets without a sexual

> predator being encouraged.

>

> I thought this site was self policing. The OP is

> well out of order posting such an inappropriate

> remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.


Well said, Elph, I agree.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there will be many that will feel sensitive and be offended.

If someone need this then there are other places to engage with people of similar attitude.

I apologize if my [unnecessary] comment caused any offence - it was flip & unthinking.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, EA - do lighten up.

>

> Be riled, if you will... but disturbed is a bit

> strong


I did actually request not to be advised to 'lighten up'


I am disturbed that regular commenters seem to find this acceptable and amusing.


Perhaps I am sensitive but that does not make me wrong.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey, 'sexual predator' is going it a bit.

> Slightly sexist, maybe, but surely a week to try

> to keep a sense of perspective and ration the

> outrage?



I didn't say I was outraged, which smacks of a dowager Duchess clutching her pearls.

Perhaps you do not find this post predatory and creepy but I did which does not make me wrong

or skew my perspective.


And I am astonished that you would excuse a dubious post and criticise mine.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
I can't keep up with all these acronyms. Anyway, I'm the wrong side of 50, single and not quite moribund yet (though that's debatable) I'd like to think I haven't been whooped with the ugly stick and have hung on to some of my youthful good looks and virility. This thread has got me thinking it's probably time I took a wife. I'm just not sure whose yet.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there

> will be many that will feel sensitive and be

> offended.

> If someone need this then there are other places

> to engage with people of similar attitude.

> I apologize if my comment caused any offence - it

> was flip & unthinking.


Thank you for your gracious response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • JessicaCT
      Plumber recommendation – Mark at Pure Plumbers

      By JessicaCT · Posted

      A shout out for Mark, owner of Pure Plumbers. 07970 971510 They're well established in the Sevenoaks area, but have recently started doing more work in SE London.  Did some v quick and efficient bathroom and boiler fixes for me; have also seen some of the bathrooms he's built, which have a nice attention to detail. Jessica    
    • beansprout
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By beansprout · Posted

      Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Penguin68
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By Penguin68 · Posted

      Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
    • Angelina
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By Angelina · Posted

      Let’s just boycott all chains in favour of local businesses.  Places like Gail’s popping up everywhere has a very damaging impact on small businesses. It’s just the same as the new empanadas place but on a bigger scale. I’ll say it a million times more, we hold the power with our choices. Let’s use our power to look after ourselves and our environment (which includes small local family businesses). And yes, I also love Chacarero.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...