Jump to content

East Dulwich

EDMP

By EDMP
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted

No need, *Bob*, men aren't defined culturally by fatherhood (mention women to any politician, Theresa May included, and what they'll talk about is childcare) and their bodies don't change when children are born, lucky things.


They don't age well from 40 on, though, so maybe one for men who've lost their hair but are still fanciable - BILF?

uncleglen

uncleglen

Posted
Posted
How do you know they are not GILFs? Although given that women are starting to breed in their late 30s I suppose they are probably MILFs....up to the ears in nappies etc...they won't have the time for much else- especially since they won't have the energy -being older 'n all, and spending their spare time in the gym.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken? and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is enough tension on the sreets without a sexual predator being encouraged.


I thought this site was self policing. The OP is well out of order posting such an inappropriate remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone please clarify is this an ironic

> thread or just good old casual sexism ?


What do you mean, 'just' as though this is somehow excusable? there is no 'just' he is advertising himself

and sounds like a ILIMMB, this isn't amusing, funny or rational, it is creepy and sinister, and uncivilised.


Back to work, disturbed.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night

> posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken?

> and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is

> enough tension on the sreets without a sexual

> predator being encouraged.

>

> I thought this site was self policing. The OP is

> well out of order posting such an inappropriate

> remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.


Well said, Elph, I agree.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there will be many that will feel sensitive and be offended.

If someone need this then there are other places to engage with people of similar attitude.

I apologize if my [unnecessary] comment caused any offence - it was flip & unthinking.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, EA - do lighten up.

>

> Be riled, if you will... but disturbed is a bit

> strong


I did actually request not to be advised to 'lighten up'


I am disturbed that regular commenters seem to find this acceptable and amusing.


Perhaps I am sensitive but that does not make me wrong.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey, 'sexual predator' is going it a bit.

> Slightly sexist, maybe, but surely a week to try

> to keep a sense of perspective and ration the

> outrage?



I didn't say I was outraged, which smacks of a dowager Duchess clutching her pearls.

Perhaps you do not find this post predatory and creepy but I did which does not make me wrong

or skew my perspective.


And I am astonished that you would excuse a dubious post and criticise mine.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
I can't keep up with all these acronyms. Anyway, I'm the wrong side of 50, single and not quite moribund yet (though that's debatable) I'd like to think I haven't been whooped with the ugly stick and have hung on to some of my youthful good looks and virility. This thread has got me thinking it's probably time I took a wife. I'm just not sure whose yet.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there

> will be many that will feel sensitive and be

> offended.

> If someone need this then there are other places

> to engage with people of similar attitude.

> I apologize if my comment caused any offence - it

> was flip & unthinking.


Thank you for your gracious response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • geh
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By geh · Posted

      I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...