Jump to content

East Dulwich

EDMP

By EDMP
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted

No need, *Bob*, men aren't defined culturally by fatherhood (mention women to any politician, Theresa May included, and what they'll talk about is childcare) and their bodies don't change when children are born, lucky things.


They don't age well from 40 on, though, so maybe one for men who've lost their hair but are still fanciable - BILF?

uncleglen

uncleglen

Posted
Posted
How do you know they are not GILFs? Although given that women are starting to breed in their late 30s I suppose they are probably MILFs....up to the ears in nappies etc...they won't have the time for much else- especially since they won't have the energy -being older 'n all, and spending their spare time in the gym.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken? and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is enough tension on the sreets without a sexual predator being encouraged.


I thought this site was self policing. The OP is well out of order posting such an inappropriate remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can someone please clarify is this an ironic

> thread or just good old casual sexism ?


What do you mean, 'just' as though this is somehow excusable? there is no 'just' he is advertising himself

and sounds like a ILIMMB, this isn't amusing, funny or rational, it is creepy and sinister, and uncivilised.


Back to work, disturbed.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only person offended by EDMP late night

> posting, feeling frisky and his X box is broken?

> and don't be telling me to lighten up. There is

> enough tension on the sreets without a sexual

> predator being encouraged.

>

> I thought this site was self policing. The OP is

> well out of order posting such an inappropriate

> remark and totally on the wrong sort of forum.


Well said, Elph, I agree.

Lordship 516

Lordship 516

Posted
Posted

Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there will be many that will feel sensitive and be offended.

If someone need this then there are other places to engage with people of similar attitude.

I apologize if my [unnecessary] comment caused any offence - it was flip & unthinking.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, EA - do lighten up.

>

> Be riled, if you will... but disturbed is a bit

> strong


I did actually request not to be advised to 'lighten up'


I am disturbed that regular commenters seem to find this acceptable and amusing.


Perhaps I am sensitive but that does not make me wrong.

Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Crikey, 'sexual predator' is going it a bit.

> Slightly sexist, maybe, but surely a week to try

> to keep a sense of perspective and ration the

> outrage?



I didn't say I was outraged, which smacks of a dowager Duchess clutching her pearls.

Perhaps you do not find this post predatory and creepy but I did which does not make me wrong

or skew my perspective.


And I am astonished that you would excuse a dubious post and criticise mine.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
I can't keep up with all these acronyms. Anyway, I'm the wrong side of 50, single and not quite moribund yet (though that's debatable) I'd like to think I haven't been whooped with the ugly stick and have hung on to some of my youthful good looks and virility. This thread has got me thinking it's probably time I took a wife. I'm just not sure whose yet.
Elphinstone's Army

Elphinstone's Army

Posted
Posted

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I agree; This is the wrong forum as there

> will be many that will feel sensitive and be

> offended.

> If someone need this then there are other places

> to engage with people of similar attitude.

> I apologize if my comment caused any offence - it

> was flip & unthinking.


Thank you for your gracious response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Simply, give us a snap election now as the last 12 months in office honestly have not been great in any sense. Let someone else have a go at turning around UK plc before it's too late. At least the last administration had the inflation and unemployment rates going in the right direction at the END. 
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Yes but what's the answer, Jazzer? No government can simply walk in and fix the economy - get the bills down, grow it and reduce debt. There is no silver bullet. The public (and the press) wants everything now, everything cheaper, but with better public services and lower taxes.  In the radio and paper, all you ever hear is pundits, MPs, think tanks and economists saying what won't work, but no one seems to know what will work.  I'm genuinely interested to hear what other views people have on here, and what they think will help, or make things worse. 
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      While they struggle with economics of UK plc, collectively we all suffer as a result of their ineptitude. 
    • Insuflo
      Councillor Jon Hartley

      By Insuflo · Posted

      I’ve tried to find details of surgeries being held before but not found any. The section of the Southwark website that details councillors’ surgeries says that: Your locally elected Councillors will be holding a roving surgery programme in the Dulwich Hill area to enable residents to raise any local issues. Residents will be notified by letter in advance of the date, time and specific streets/roads where the surgery will take place.  Surgeries are not held in August, on Bank Holidays, Easter or in Christmas Week.  Dulwich Hill Ward Councillors I’ve never seen any notification of surgeries being held, including on the DH councillors’ social media accounts. I don’t know if any other residents of Dulwich Hill have? Neighbouring wards all seem to have times and places posted for surgeries.   

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...