Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Admin,


Thank you for your continued and often unappreciated work behind the scenes to support this wonderful online resource for the community of East Dulwich.


I would like to propose a separate Woofmarkthedog section - as a kind of ring fenced "sandpit" for Woof to continue his deluge of aimless, pointless, ADD ramblings by himself without spoiling the Lounge for the rest of us. Whilst the Lounge is meant as a place for light hearted banter, we have our limits and I believe I would have the support of many in giving Woof his own space to play in to spray his flotsam. He'd be able to have conversations with himself and piss/crap to his hearts content without spoiling forum enjoyment of others.


What say you sir?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11310-woofmarkthedog-section/
Share on other sites

I thought Woofmarkthedog's Rubbish Thread ? marked a creative departure for the Lounge and seems to have anticipated the Human Street art in Willi Dorner's Bodies in Urban Spaces project which is part of the Brighton Festival.


(However I question the legal status of his ? and TM marks)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/7724364/Willi-Dorners-Bodies-in-Urban-Spaces-project-takes-part-in-the-Brighton-Festival.html

I ADORE the Forum's pet dog. Live and let live I say. Although (Willy)-Woof can be quite close to the mark (pun intended) at times, as far as I am aware, he hasn't breached any of the Forum's rules.


And, on those occasions where he does get a little out of hand, a muzzle (in conjunction with a syringe containing a minute dose of phenobarbital) usually does the trick.



*grabs placard and chants outside the EDF's offices*


LONG LIVE THE DOG!


LONG LIVE THE DOG!

Judging by the veritable volley, nay, DELUGE of cross PM's from Woof fans across the expanses of, er, Lordship Lane, the consensus appears to be that whilst annoying/loved in equal, Marmite-like measures, the dawg should be allowed to roam free and unfettered.


I also thank the forumite who messaged me to remind that behind every Orville there lies a Keith Harris.


http://thedailycrazy.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/orville1.jpg



Long live the dog......


*Groans*

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> MrBen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Long live the dog......

> >

> > *Groans*

>

>

> You're a good sport MrBen...

>

>

> (but seriously, what were you thinking?):))


Next time I advise using a W**F Survey (tu):)-D

You know...



I drank half-o-bottle of "whisky" only to realise it had no "e" in it


I was well pi55ed off


So I had to start again..( on the wiskey, of course )


Have you ever tried the one without the "h" in it.....?


( honest, I can't tell the "diffo"...)


* hits head *



W**F

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Have you ever tried the one without the "h" in

> it.....?

>

> ( honest, I can't tell the "diffo"...)

>

> * hits head *


No, can't say that I have. Have just tried some without the "s" though, but as with your experience of the substance without the "h", I can't tell the difference either.


*walks into wall knocking herself unconscious*

  • 1 month later...

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear Admin,

>

> Thank you for your continued and often

> unappreciated work behind the scenes to support

> this wonderful online resource for the community

> of East Dulwich.

>

> I would like to propose a separate Woofmarkthedog

> section - as a kind of ring fenced "sandpit" for

> Woof to continue his deluge of aimless, pointless,

> ADD ramblings by himself without spoiling the

> Lounge for the rest of us. Whilst the Lounge is

> meant as a place for light hearted banter, we have

> our limits and I believe I would have the support

> of many in giving Woof his own space to play in to

> spray his flotsam. He'd be able to have

> conversations with himself and piss/crap to his

> hearts content without spoiling forum enjoyment of

> others.

>

> What say you sir?



Click the colon next to the name after posted by: ! It will revolutionise reading threads on the forum

WMTD, provides light relief, sometimes for himself, sometimes for the general public.

If the groooming parlour The Gay Dog that used to be at the Rye end of Barry Road was still in business, I know he'd be a regular.

It was next to a human grooming parlour named Renee Parisienne, was it not?


And a Ronnie James Dio 'devil's head' salute to MrBen, what a thorough-going gent you are.


Well done.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I always attend "Dog About Town" in

> Peckham. My pooch always comes up a treat after a

> trip down there (though she does come out smelling

> rather like a tarts knicker drawer...........)



Sounds ok to me! Let me know next time she goes.... I like a good sniff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...