Jump to content

Cycle to work scheme


hpsaucey

Recommended Posts

HI there. Has anyone used the cycle to work scheme to get a new bicycle? I don't think I understand how it works and was hoping someone else did.


It says that you pay a salary sacrifice for the bike for a 12-month rental period but the employer owns the bike and you have to buy it from them 'at market value' after the 12 months.


I'm sure I'm being stupid and misinterpreting but doesn't this mean you end up paying extra in effect?


Help!!!


Helen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I did it last year - you end up saving a fair amount - even more if you're a 40% tax payer. And yes, they tend to have a nominal value at the end of day rather than a market one.


The other good thing about it is that you can get any cycling accessories that you need at the same time. So you also save money on a bike lock, lights, rack/panniers, jacket.


Depending on which scheme your employer has signed up to, you can end up saving the cost of the VAT on the bike and accessories plus not paying the tax on that portion of your salary so it ends up quite a bit cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You buy a voucher for up to ?1000 which you redeem to buy a bike from somewhere that your employer has the scheme with.

You then pay back the voucher to your employer over 12 monthly instalments by way of at source salary sacrifice - so because its coming out of your gross salary you are essentially getting a discount at your rate of income tax. I think its VAT free too but Im not sure.

So if you want to buy a ?1000 bike it would normally cost you about ?90 a month but you should deduct your tax rate from that so depending on what you earn it could be as little as ?50 a month. At the end of the year you pay a small nominal amount and then the bike is officially yours. Before that its officially the employers (but you use it) so that if you stop paying your monthly amount because you leave the firm they can take it off you or charge you the full amount of the bike. Like a hire-purchase agreement on a car.


If you plan on staying with your employer for a year then definitely do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You chose a bike and accessories. You request the bike or a voucher fir the cLue from your employer. Your employer pays the bike company for the bicycle you have chosen (capped at ?1000). If your employer is vat registered, they then deduct 17.5% (because they can reclaim the vat seperately) and then the outstanding balance is deducted in 12 equal instalments. As mentioned above, it's deducted before you pay tax and ni so you save either 22 or 40% tax plus 1% ni.


The bike remains the property of the employer at all times. This is important because hire purchase schemes aren't eligible for salary sacrifice but hire schemes are. Generally what happens is that your employer chooses to dispose of the bike and you take it off their hands for a nominal fee. But that can't be agreed in advance and committed to writing.


So in practice;


value of bike = 1000

cost you pay = 825 (the remaining 175 is the vat reclaimed by company)

monthly sum before tax and ni = 68.75

how much that monthy sum would cost you in salary if you were paying it out of your pocket after you'd been paid; 116.53 (40% tax plus ni) or 89.29

monthly saving to you = 47.78 (if higher rate tax payer) or 20.54 (if lower)


hope this helps. The evans website has quite a good savings calculator.


A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can recommend Leon from Electrical Initiative hands down. He’s efficient, always gives a specific time slot, is punctual and does a great job. He’s been on my contact list for the last eight years, and any electrical work he is the first person I call.
    • I remember some old threads about this and have just checked. Use the search function, type in half Houses and there are 3 old threads. 2 of them have specific titles, freehold and water supply.
    • 57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) It seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions (where they are actual questions). You ducked and deflected my two for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘have you stopped beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle. 🙄    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...