Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it was a great example of the value that an institution like the BBC is to society. In so many countries in this world the ruling party would be dictating to the broadcaster which member of the opposition they could invite.


Hopefully it really pissed off those in the conservative party who would have the BBC scrapped in favour of their minister for propaganda Mr Murdoch?s Media Empire.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps Labour should have put Campbell up instead

> of Jack Straw when they had Nick Griffin of BNP on

> Question Time


One of the points made last night if I understood right is the BBC invites people, as opposed to the parties putting people up.

Cowards...




Dave.


" Ooo Cambell's back, he's well 'ard "


Nick.


"You said you'd already "done" him Dave"


Dave.


"Er yeah, but it's your turn"


Nick.


"Ahhh, but it's my bath night tonight "


Dave.


" I'm staying at grannies "



Nick & Dave


" Let's watch him on the telly then.."



W**F

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The really rather worrying thing about last night,

> is that I found myself agreeing with Pers Morgan a

> few times!


That is more than rather worrying, Keef.

Piers Morgan is a corrupt, talentless piece of filth.

I didn't see the programme, but I'm willing to bet he was foghorning to the gallery, I mean why change the formula?

But then, never mind.

Interestingly I read today that David Laws, Treasury Chief Secretary, is now embroiled in a repayment of ?40,000 of expenses http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/may/29/david-laws-treasury-expenses-claim and is "fighting for his political life", well The Guardian thinks so anyway.


I imagine it's purely coincidence that it was him who was originally pencilled in to appear http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/27/government-boycott-question-time-alastair-campbell .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't access the article - what's the gist?  I took the markets getting jittery when she was crying at PMQs to be a sign that they trusted her. But maybe it was because they were simply worried about any form of instability.  The NIC hikes have stymied the economy, which we could all see a mile off. Will a wealth tax improve things? Does anyone here think the trickle down has any impact and that chasing out the super rich will help things? Or are we just seeing off the biggest contributors to the economy? And has the Kwasi approach ever worked anywhere else?  Economics is not my strong point at all, I'd love to know others' opinions, but it seems to be she has few options, especially as the party is so divided. 
    • does either of them have a surgery? probably not over summer, but I thought they had to give the opportunity for their constituents to meet them.
    • MaryT, I’ve contacted the Dulwich Hill councillors several times in recent years, always copying them both in. I have never had an acknowledgment from Jon Hartley (not even an automated response or out-of-office) nor had any response or engagement from him regarding the issue raised.   On each occasion, only Maggie Browning responded (she uses an out-of-office if she is away). The last time, I received no response from either for 3 months, until Maggie Browning emailed me to apologise for not responding and asking if the problem had been resolved.
    • The  Kwasi effect is being considered. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...