Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Well, the evidence suggests that your lifestyle does not appear to warrant a dishwasher at all. Indeed, I have reasonable cause to believe that you live on Scoop's coconut ice cream



This is a vile and base calumny, and clearly libellous. I had mint choc chip at the weekend (paid for with one of mys sisters, getting my mother in change: still not sure who had the real bargain there :'(). Anyway expect my chap popping around to serve the writ any day now...


The new dishwasher is the dog's bollocks!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

>

> > *rings SCIC VIP hotline to reserve stocks*

>

>

> Ahem!

>

> *couriers Notice to katie1997 in respect of

> infringement of intellectual property primary

> right: unauthorised use of Trademark SCIC*


*respectfully submits application to use SCIC trademark to ladymuck*


I mean....does woof(trade)markthedog have the monopoly on these or what? Y-es I thought so!


Katie1997


Oh dishwashers are great btw, did I mention that Bosch are good?


Edited: Bosch obviously..

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a vile and base calumny, and clearly

> libellous. I had mint choc chip at the weekend...


Given the available data on the now rather famous EDF. My on-line observations constitute "fair comment" in that they were fair and not motivated by malice. Moreover, not only do my observations fall short of being false, they also fail to discredit your reputation (such as it is). Had I referred to you as (but, for want of another example) a "greedy pig" now, that would have been quite another matter:))).


> Anyway expect my chap popping

> around to serve the writ any day now...


Given your manifest lack of evidence, and the fact that your reputation has suffered no damage, it is my submission that you, the Plaintiff, have no case to answer. Notwithstanding this and in an attempt to demonstrate goodwill, I would be prepared to accept a small token from you in return for foregoing a counter-action against you for injury to my feelings which your - rather misguided - initiation of legal proceedings against me have caused to my egg-shell like personality. Under the circumstances, I feel that a double scoop (large) of SCIC(TM) (together with a sample of the mint choc chip) would be appropriate.


> The new dishwasher is the dog's bollocks!


This was never in dispute. And, having now viewed the photograph, remains so. In any event, it is irrelevant as not pertinent to the legal matter at hand.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought a "pony" was slang for fifty quid? You

> know, like:

>

> I've got a pony in my pocket

> I'll get the suitcase from the

> Cos if you want the best, but you don't ask

> questions

> Then brother, I'm your man

...................::...............

What...


...a load of "pony & trap"



Really....




w**F


>

> No?

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *respectfully submits application to use SCIC

> trademark to ladymuck*





Dear Ms. Katherina Van Der Wotsit,


In consideration of your previous, rather gracious, loan to me of your chauffeur, I would be prepared to permit you to use the trademark SCIC.


I would stress, however, that this act of generosity on my part should not be taken as a precedent for the future - any abuse of which shall result in my immediately seeking an injunction against you with a view to obtaining damages for infringement of registered trade mark and passing off.


Lady Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The new dishwasher is the dog's bollocks!


Plainly both unhygienic and what's more needlessly cruel.

Expect a visit from the RSPCA and the Health & Safety Executive in the near future.

I won't dob you in to the Animal Liberation Front for the moment, Christ no one deserves that.

Actually, this all reminds me of a (terrible) joke...


Woman has to go out...leaves house with her parrot inside.


Meanwhile, man comes along and knocks on door.


Knock Knock


Parrot: who is it?


Man: it's the plumber


Parrot: who is it?


Man: it's the plumber


Parrot: who is it?


Man: IT'S THE PLUMBER!


Parrot: who is it?


Man: jeez...you deaf? It's the plumber.


Parrot: who is it?


Man: IT'S THE F-UCKING PLUMBER!


At which point the plumber has a heart attack, collapses and dies.


[2 hours' later, woman returns home...sees dead man at her door]


Woman: who the hell is this?


Parrot: IT'S THE F-UCKING PLUMBER!

Two wee Scotsmen who cannae reach the doorbell.


Look, I blame the Catholic church, had I not been raised in it, I wouldn't have had access to the monthly Crusade Messenger magazine, which in turn furnished me with this sort of joke.


Though now I think of it, it may have been the secular Whizzer and Chips.


Or Wham! even.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two wee Scotsmen who cannae reach the doorbell.

>

> Look, I blame the Catholic church, had I not been

> raised in it, I wouldn't have had access to the

> monthly Crusade Messenger magazine, which in turn

> furnished me with this sort of joke.

>

> Though now I think of it, it may have been the

> secular Whizzer and Chips.

>

> Or Wham! even.


Ahem...have I missed something? Where's the rest of the joke? I.e. what happens after:


Two wee Scotsmen who cannae reach the doorbell.

Keep up LadyM.

I said 'Knock knock'.

You said 'Who's there'?

I said 'Two wee Scotsmen who cannae reach the doorbell'

That was the punchline. Not a great or even a good punchline I'll admit.

But blame the Crusade Messenger. Or Whizzer & Chips. Or Wham!


I'm Pontius Pilating this one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A belated recommendation for Iain and Paul od Oddbods who came to help me with various jobs before Christmas.  Painting ceiling, renewing silicone around bath, repairing a window sill which was almost beyond repair and hanging a large mirror.   Very happy with their work and they are friendly and very reliable and excellent at communicating.  No hesitation in recommending them.
    • I just wanted to post for all my neighbours a recommendation of Niko, the wonderful plumber who works locally. Niko has done work for me over the years, including large and small jobs. He recently replaced four radiators in my house which have helped us really be warm for the first time! I recommend Niko so whole heartedly because (1) he is completely straight forward and will advise you not to do something / a cheaper solution, if that is what is best for you; and (2) he is one of the kindest and most honest people I have ever known. He goes the extra mile to sort out problems, particularly urgent ones.   
    • Scaremongering - there is very little vacant land in East Dulwich available as sites for building 9 storey buildings so this is rather hypothetical. It could even be said the occasional taller, modern building breaks up the monotony of Victorian terraced housing.
    • This is simply untrue. The area is not 2/3 storeys maximum. Hambledon Court is on the other side of tracks from the Jewson site on Burrow Rd, is 8 storeys, and is barely known (let alone bothersome) to most people in East Dulwich. Felbridge House, Petworth House etc on the opposite side of the station from the new development are all 5 storeys tall. East Dulwich Charter (which neighbours the new development) is itself 4-5 storeys (depending on which block you're talking about). What's more, Hambledon Court was finished in about 1978 iirc and no-one has built anything similar around here since then - so the "slippery slope" "genie in the bottle" argument doesn't work either. You can't simultaneously argue that Southwark is too slow in approving new construction but also suggest this will lead to a flood of new high-rise housing! At current rates of approval, we can expect our next 8 storey building to arrive in...2072!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...