Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Those who voted picked from the list of all entries the one they liked best. Some entries got no votes.


The name with the most votes won.


The only people eligible to vote were those who are on the kickabout player list - because it's their team.

I think what DJKQ is trying to say is that some of the entered names received no votes (i.e. no-one voted for them) - therefore those names got zero points. Is that what you mean DJKQ? Apologies in advance if I've got it wrong.

Yep that's what I mean.


Look at post no.2 Narnia - it clearly says that the winner would be decided by the squad from all the suggestions put forward by everyone on this thread. So no mystery, just straightforward vote for the name you like best.

The Dulwich Dynamites is going to take a bit of living up to, with Milfwall there'd have been less pressure.

Still you know best.

Good luck and make sure you contact E.I. Addio so we can have a full report of the first fixture.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> with Milfwall there'd have been less

> pressure.


Thing is many woman don't see the funny side of Milfwall lol.


There are a couple of local 7 a side ladies teams (league) and for fun at the end of the summer I might just organise a friendly and make it an EDF event.


And already there are a couple of ladies that have come along, never having played before that are naturals, there are a couple of others that will be very good and have natural football brains. I have every confidence that in time we'll be able to put on a good show!

This is the funniest thing I have read in ages.

Milfwall would have been a brilliant name you bunch of girly cowardy so-called footballers you!

Second only to the Peckham Roses of course.


Well done DJKQ for all the organising though and I hope you are all going to be a great team.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...