Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was sitting in the sunshine at the front of Green & Blue today sipping our delicious coffee and doing some work. A man walked past me, with one trouser leg rolled up to the knee, and the other worn in the usual manner. He was in all other ways unremarkable.


Later this morning, I walked back to my car, and a different man walked past me, with one trouser leg rolled up to the knee, the other worn in the usual manner. He too was in all other ways unremarkable.


As I arrived at my house, a third man walked past me, with one trouser leg rolled up to the knee - and you can guess the rest.


Can anyone explain? Is this a football related gesture that I'm unaware of? Is the left knee flashers convention in town? I am suspicious that this is no mere coincidence.......

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/11882-nice-bit-of-trouser/
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>These

> legs, all three of them, were squeaky clean. I

> checked.


You checked?!!!


LOL!


PS: leg tends not to "catch" the chain as do trousers. However, should it do so - one quick rub gets rid of grubbiness.


*still laughing*

Is this one of them, LB? If he's not, then its one heck of a coincidence. I spotted him lurking outside my front door about ten minutes ago. He said he was from Kansas in the US and was sucked up in a tornado and dumped here. He asked me if I had seen any of his three 'friends' and a dog called 'Toto'.


He's on his way down to you.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bare nipple is usually the dead give away for

> Masons. Did your eyes reach that far?



We can't give you your dignity back - thats gone for good. But you can have your money back, from paddy power.

Ooooo..



How very curious..


Though today I'm wearing my garment above both knees, so I am


http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Images/Models/Full/25222.jpg "Coz, I is on two wheels bad, innit"


( well as "bad" as a Brompton can be )




Ⓦ♕♕Ⓕ?


By Royaal? appoint-o-mento

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brum - go on fess up. You just took a picture of

> your own hairy pins and posted them on a public

> forum, didn't you. You big show off.



Damn and blast woman, am I that transparent??!!


*unrolls trouser, slinks back inside, quietly closes front door and draws curtains*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...