Jump to content

Recommended Posts

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well it is summer time (is it?) and the weather is

> unpredictable so you can't blame em for walking

> around like this.



Hmmm... so in other words, these are men who sit on the fence. Could be something else to look out for.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well thanks for checking all the same!

>

> So. We have three masonic US gangsta members who

> own incorrectly constructed cycles wandering about

> Lordship Lane.

>

> Oddly, I feel better for knowing that.


LB (so close to LD!), just think of it as the first episode of the next series of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

By episode ten all will be resolved. In some sort of fashion.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two "normal" blokes and a yoof.

>

> Does this inform your analysis?


I think when the yoof do it, it's an American rap/gang thing, implying they are "packing heat".


For grown men in suits, it will be a Masonic thingy.

If I may step in here and clear this business up. These fellows were not wearing trousers with one leg rolled up they were in fact wearing shorts with one leg rolled down. The reason for this was because yesterday was Monday.



Honestly, whoever heard of a mason riding a bike?

Brendan, I have always considered you to be a good enough sort of egg and one doesn't want to be contrary. But I can assure you that I know a trouser when I see one, and that was a trouser. Not a pretty one, nor very well tailored since you're asking, but a trouser nonetheless.

Moos, or more likely the have one leg rolled up to show they ARE wearing a tracker bracelet.


More likely is the bike thing. Especially if they're riding fixed bikes - getting your trousers caught in the chain on a fixie doesn't mean dirty trousers, it means your legs gets pulled into the drive chain, blood everywhere and you end up on the floor.

But njc97, I think we established that it was the incorrect leg of the trouser to be attributable to cyclists.......Or do you disagree? Are there places where the bike chain requires the other leg to be exposed? Maybe in France, where they ride on the other side of the road?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...