Jump to content

Recommended Posts

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well it is summer time (is it?) and the weather is

> unpredictable so you can't blame em for walking

> around like this.



Hmmm... so in other words, these are men who sit on the fence. Could be something else to look out for.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well thanks for checking all the same!

>

> So. We have three masonic US gangsta members who

> own incorrectly constructed cycles wandering about

> Lordship Lane.

>

> Oddly, I feel better for knowing that.


LB (so close to LD!), just think of it as the first episode of the next series of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

By episode ten all will be resolved. In some sort of fashion.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two "normal" blokes and a yoof.

>

> Does this inform your analysis?


I think when the yoof do it, it's an American rap/gang thing, implying they are "packing heat".


For grown men in suits, it will be a Masonic thingy.

If I may step in here and clear this business up. These fellows were not wearing trousers with one leg rolled up they were in fact wearing shorts with one leg rolled down. The reason for this was because yesterday was Monday.



Honestly, whoever heard of a mason riding a bike?

Brendan, I have always considered you to be a good enough sort of egg and one doesn't want to be contrary. But I can assure you that I know a trouser when I see one, and that was a trouser. Not a pretty one, nor very well tailored since you're asking, but a trouser nonetheless.

Moos, or more likely the have one leg rolled up to show they ARE wearing a tracker bracelet.


More likely is the bike thing. Especially if they're riding fixed bikes - getting your trousers caught in the chain on a fixie doesn't mean dirty trousers, it means your legs gets pulled into the drive chain, blood everywhere and you end up on the floor.

But njc97, I think we established that it was the incorrect leg of the trouser to be attributable to cyclists.......Or do you disagree? Are there places where the bike chain requires the other leg to be exposed? Maybe in France, where they ride on the other side of the road?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Green Party policy on driver behaviour: Default 20mph Speed Limits: The party supports making 20 mph the default speed limit in all residential areas. 40mph Speed Limits: Proposing a default 40 mph speed limit in non-residential areas, excluding major roads. Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs): Promoting the expansion of LTNs to reduce "rat-running" in residential areas. Ending Internal Combustion Engine Sales: A target to end the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles by 2030. Environmental Charging: Implementing a Carbon Tax on fossil fuels to increase the cost of petrol and diesel, incentivizing a shift to electric vehicles or public transport. Prioritizing Active Travel: Shifting funding from road building to walking, cycling, and public transport infrastructure, aiming for 50% of trips in towns and cities to be made by these methods by 2030. Improved Driver Training: Supporting "eco-driving" techniques to reduce emissions and fuel usage.  Some of which is good, some unrealistic, and on driver behaviour doesn't go far enough. Difficult to summarise the Lib Dems position as it is a bit wishy washy wanting to appeal to both the eco warrior and the NIMBY.  Sadly I know people who are both!
    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...