Jump to content

Really, how free are we to choose a different life style


Recommended Posts

I'm not talking about building a house on Green Belt and I know there are worse events going on in the world but just how free are we even in the West? Recently I started to Google for information about living on a Narrow boat or living in a motor home as a way to save money for a future deposit by not having to drop my hard earned money into the bottomless hole of rent. While it is possible to spend time in a motor home or a Narrow boat you can not really have a different life style from the norm because you have to have a normal residential address. Unless you have a residential address everything will collapse. You can not insure a car, you can not register with a doctor etc etc. Having read this disappointing news I then suddenly really understood the meaning of homelessness and why once homeless how the system is the barrier to a person sorting themselves out. But not only that, there are few choices unless you have a lot of money to change a life style you are not happy with in this country. In this day and age is that acceptable?

Is this a philosophical question to take us away from our real lives, as you are answering your own questions, which seem obvious in today's world.

If you have the means to purchase a boat or motor home and a means of earning money and the luxury of choice then you cannot possibly know the meaning of homelessness or are likely to. Have you any idea how spoilt you sound?

Renting for many is a way of life necessity, compromise.

Disappointing news?

Be off with you and your whim to change a lifestyle you are not happy with in this country in this day and age.

And spend a few moments reading the Solomons Passage thread.

M.R Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not talking about building a house on Green

> Belt and I know there are worse events going on in

> the world but just how free are we even in the

> West? Recently I started to Google for information

> about living on a Narrow boat or living in a motor

> home as a way to save money for a future deposit

> by not having to drop my hard earned money into

> the bottomless hole of rent. While it is possible

> to spend time in a motor home or a Narrow boat you

> can not really have a different life style from

> the norm because you have to have a normal

> residential address. Unless you have a residential

> address everything will collapse. You can not

> insure a car, you can not register with a doctor

> etc etc. Having read this disappointing news I

> then suddenly really understood the meaning of

> homelessness and why once homeless how the system

> is the barrier to a person sorting themselves out.

> But not only that, there are few choices unless

> you have a lot of money to change a life style you

> are not happy with in this country. In this day

> and age is that acceptable?


Well...Mrs H and I looked into getting a houseboat, yes there are a lot of things to take into consideration but if you go about things the right way none of the difficulties you mention are insuperable - what put us off was the fact that however old one became the mooring fees would still be there. But you can do most of the things you say are impossible anyway, and mainly I agree with Elph, it ain't like you're crouching behind a wall in Homs, is it? Being unable to buy a boat is not "understanding the meaning of homelessness" unless you are actually kipping down tonight under a railway arch.

Interesting question, maybe look at how the travelling community live for a pointer as they obviously have a way of insuring their vehicles, registering (temporarily ) with doctors and schools and other essential services.


Therefore it's not as impossible as you you have implied as there is a way to still live and use services even with a temporary address


Alternatively go completely off grid and become a hermit


Good luck with your dilemma

Ok Ok. I was hoping for some intelligent thoughts on the subject of changing a life style in the UK and how possible that is and is not. Do you know how lacking in awareness you sound? Clearly you are not philosophical and have spent too long up your own behind, stuck in your own linear life to take in something someone else might write without viewing it in a negative way and so missing the point!

By the way spoiled I am definitely not. Open to understanding I am which, maybe is a quality you should start developing or of course, keep your negative self to yourself


Elphinstone's Army Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this a philosophical question to take us away

> from our real lives, as you are answering your own

> questions, which seem obvious in today's world.

> If you have the means to purchase a boat or motor

> home and a means of earning money and the luxury

> of choice then you cannot possibly know the

> meaning of homelessness or are likely to. Have you

> any idea how spoilt you sound?

> Renting for many is a way of life necessity,

> compromise.

> Disappointing news?

> Be off with you and your whim to change a

> lifestyle you are not happy with in this country

> in this day and age.

> And spend a few moments reading the Solomons

> Passage thread.

Have a look at this discussion on another forum, which helps to explain the difference between permanently parked mobile homes (holiday homes that people live in all year round) and park homes on residential sites (our equivalent of US trailer parks) which could be an option for you.


http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1484721


It would be good if you could delete your other thread as it's a bit confusing to have two on the same topic.

this thread reminded me of the Agnes Cunninham song that Ry Cooder recorded- How can you keep on moving (unless you migrate too)

......especially this verse

'Now if you pitch your little tent along the broad highway

The board of sanitation says, "sorry, you can't stay"

Come on, come on, get moving it's their everlasting cry

Can't stay, can't go back, can't migrate, so where in the hell am i'...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...