Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Offside for Americans

>

> This should do the trick LM.


Well, I am not an American...but, I think I am just beginning to get the gist of it (a bit). Thank you Narnia.


I think one of the reasons I am having such problems with all these explanations is that I understood (quite incorrectly it seems) that, when players spoke of "their goal", they were referring to the goal in which they need to shoot/score, when in fact "their goal" refers to the goal where their goalie hangs out (i.e. that place where their opponents are attempting to shoot/score). Have I got that bit right at least?

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM, just make sure there are always two opponents

> between you and their end of the pitch.

>

> Does that make sense?



hmmmmmmm - no...sorry:-$


Oh dear, maybe HB is right and I shouldn't worry my pea brain about such a thing. This would be fine if I didn't now play. And to think that for years I have been quite content watching footie in complete ignorance...such bliss...but now...


*sinks into mild depression*

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did you play today, LadyMuck?


I did PR...it was a great game...though I am currently limping around with a packet of frozen peas inside my jeans::o.


>People learn better

> through actions than words. And DJKQ knows it.


Well, I am ashamed to say that I was offside at least 3 times today and I just couldn't see why. (But I did save 2 goals!! hee hee)


DJKQ is a fantastic coach/mentor bye the way - as well as a brilliant player...BIG respect to her. (Thanks DJKQ).

HonaloochieB Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

> *looks aghast at the Muckatollah's seemingly

> irrational outburst, but resists the urge to opine

> 'Chicks, eh'? Wanders away deep in puzzlement at

> LM's vexation at what he thought was a helpful and

> supportive post.


> Walks away limping, but resolves not to attend to

> his groin area until in the privacy of his own

> spare room where the self-massage necessary will

> not excite comment*



*hesitates*


erm...


*shifts about uncomfortably whilst avoiding all eye contact with HB*


I'm...erm...sorry HB...but your post was a bit patronising and condescending. And as for defaming my beloved George Best (RIP Georgie), what were you thinking (*minor sniff*). But I cannot remain cross with you for long.


Hug?


*passes HB pack of frozen sweetcorn*

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> ----

> > *looks aghast at the Muckatollah's seemingly

> > irrational outburst, but resists the urge to

> opine

> > 'Chicks, eh'? Wanders away deep in puzzlement

> at

> > LM's vexation at what he thought was a helpful

> and

> > supportive post.

>

> > Walks away limping, but resolves not to attend

> to

> > his groin area until in the privacy of his own

> > spare room where the self-massage necessary

> will

> > not excite comment*

>

>

> *hesitates*

>

> erm...

>

> *shifts about uncomfortably whilst avoiding all

> eye contact with HB*

>

> I'm...erm...sorry HB...but your post was a bit

> patronising and condescending. And as for

> defaming my beloved George Best (RIP Georgie),

> what were you thinking (*minor sniff*). But I

> cannot remain cross with you for long.

>

> Hug?

>

> *passes HB pack of frozen sweetcorn*


Hug accepted, naturally.


Sweetcorn also accepted, and applied in a way the CO-OP never thought it might be when they first sourced it in a fair trade fashion.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's Football.

>

> "Footie" is a middle class, prawn munching

> construction


*yawns and flings left-over prawn tails/shells at Quids*


Besides, his Lordship HB has spoken...rather...has granted a special Dispensation.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm convinced most linesen don't understand it....

> Especially in Old Firm matches.


Seriously Mick Mac? That makes me feel a teensy weensy bit less stupid.


But when playing, you don't really want to be subjecting your team players to constant penalties...I mean...it's so embarrassing...


But I think I am beginning to understand it now (thanks everyone)...although it seems a silly rule to me. Surely your opponent's failure to position players appropriately so as to prevent a goal from your team shouldn't result in your team then being penalised? Oh good grief...am I getting confused again?

LOL footie is a common term used by people in my home town of Liverpool by ALL classes.............defined as 'slang'.


Anyone further patronising or confusing Ladymuck will be pressed ganged into joining our soon to be formed cheerleading wing.


http://photos4.meetupstatic.com/photos/event/b/4/5/a/600_16186170.jpeg

OK, just had to check this out.


First things first:


footie

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary

Singular

footie

Alternative spelling of footy.


Then:


Football - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Association football, also known as football, soccer, footy and footie .....


So there we have it: footie, footy, football, soccer - all the same.

Interestingly this website cites "FOOTY" as modern slang for football. So DJKQ is quite correct.


Ahem...DJKQ...lost your scouse accent did you say? I'm sure I heard you say the word "bath" without the incorporation of the letter "r" earlier on:)).


Speaking of which, I'm orff to have a barth!

Yeah right...what about this then...where you omitted the "r" in "classes"...hee hee


Re: The Off Side Rule in Footie

Posted by: DJKillaQueen Yesterday, 10:50PM


LOL footie is a common term used by people in my home town of Liverpool by ALL classes.............defined as 'slang'.



You say classes...

I say clarsses...

You say bath...

I say barth...



*limps away as fast as possible*

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> I didn't mean to imply you are American LM.


> It's

> just that Americans are, well, you know.........


Don't worry Narnia - I think I know what you meant.


Having re-visited all of the comments/links on this thread whilst most people were asleep, I now recognise that, yes, the offside rule is complicated and that perhaps HB's earlier post was well-intentioned and not as patronising as I first took it to be (in fact I see that now - so, apologies again HB - I think my inability to understand coupled with the ensuing frustration that this promoted within me contributed to my outburst).


Anyway Narnia, having "worked" on understanding this rule through part of the night, your "American" link has actually proved to be enormously helpful (that combined with the computer's most succinct explanation: "...just make sure there are always two opponents between you and their end of the pitch" - ever thought of entering the teaching profession HAL9000?). As a consequence of this thread, the rule is finally becoming clearer. As for the reason for the rule, well that remains a mystery to me! However, one thing at a time:)).


How much my pea brain has assimilated will manifest itself when, hopefully, I play again in a couple of weeks' time.


Thanks all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.assistancedogs.org.uk/information-hub/assistance-dogs-emotional-support-dogs-and-therapy-dogs/   hello   i’d be interested to understand if anyone.has experience of Assistance Dogs especially for autistic children of different ages for emotional support and therapy   There was a prior thread on this topic on EDF 10 hrs ago but it had limited experiences and there was a (claimed) change in UK legislation in 2019. Whilst the industry appears unregulated/unlicensed, there are several providers (approx 15, perhaps more) who claim to have fully trained dogs or say that they can help families to train a puppy/young dog over the 18-24 months.  The latter obviously comes with a need for strong commitment to the challenge. Costs for a fully trained assistance dog are quoted at £13-15k albeit they claim £23k total cost to train the dog. On the one hand, this could potentially be a useful solution for some families if such a dog was truly trained as their websites claim and such a dog was accepted in public places and schools etc… On the other hand, I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an assistance dog of this type or in this context (only for a blind or partially sighted person) and hence a real risk of fraud or exploitation! The SEN challenge for families coupled with limited resources in schools or from local authorities or the NHS as well as the extremely challenging experience of many families with schools offering little or no support or making the situation worse leaves a big risk of lots of different types of fraud and or exploitation in this area.          
    • Hi there  We live on Woodwarde Road backing on to Alleyns Top Field.  Our cat Gigi has gone missing — it’s been about 24 hours now. She is a cream Bengal. Could you please check sheds, garages, or anywhere she might have got stuck please? And if you could keep an eye out or share on any local groups/forums, we’d really appreciate it. Photo attached.   Thanks so much! My name is Jeff on 07956 910068. 
    • Colin.    One for the old school.   Just saying.
    • Signed, and I will share it elsewhere, thank you for posting this. It's got nearly 70,000 signatures at present, and apparently runs till February.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...