Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lets get this in perspective Jah - it was 1 point!

> You are still bottom of the league and we are in

> 3rd!


How many points behind top spot? ;-)


Don't you sometimes wish that Atila was still here.......

Everton 2 Fulham 0

Chelsea 2 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 4 Hull City 0

Middlesbrough 1 West Ham 0

Portsmouth 1 Wigan Athletic 1

Stoke City 0 Arsenal 3

West Bromwich 1 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 0 Liverpool 5


Bolton Wanderers 0 Manchester City 1


Newcastle United 1 Aston Villa 0

Five-nil! You're having a fucking laugh.


Everton 2 Fulham 0

Chelsea 3 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 4 Hull City 0

Middlesbrough 2 West Ham 1

Portsmouth 3 Wigan Athletic 1

Stoke City 1 Arsenal 3

West Bromwich 1 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 2 Liverpool 2


Bolton Wanderers 0 Manchester City 3


Newcastle United 2 Aston Villa 2


Edited coz I felt like it ok.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladygooner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Lets get this in perspective Jah - it was 1

> point!

> > You are still bottom of the league and we are

> in

> > 3rd!

>

> How many points behind top spot? ;-)

>

> Don't you sometimes wish that Atila was still

> here.......


Annasfield - I do hope you are not comparing me to Atila?!

Everton 2 Fulham 1

Chelsea 3 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 1 Hull City 1

Middlesbrough 2 West Ham 0

Portsmouth 2 Wigan Athletic 1

Stoke City 0 Arsenal 2

West Bromwich 0 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 4 Liverpool 4

Bolton Wanderers 0 Manchester City 2

Newcastle United 2 Aston Villa 1

If our defense does that to me, I think I'll give up on football. I'll post what I really want to say here after Saturday's game.


LadyG - of course I'm not comparing you to Atila. As much as he pissed me off, I actually quite miss the banter.


Jah / Bon3yard - you going on Saturday?

Yes, I thought you being a little facetious Lady G. I might have put 2-2 on the predictions thingy but if I'm really honest I think Liverpool will win 3-1. We've had a good start under Harry Redknapp but the bubble will probably burst this weekend, mind you having said that Liverpool have got to lose at some point and I'm hoping it'll be this weekend against the Spurs.

Everton 2 Fulham 1

Chelsea 2 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 3 Hull City 0

Middlesbrough 1 West Ham 2

Portsmouth 2 Wigan Athletic 1

Stoke City 0 Arsenal 3

West Bromwich 0 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 2 Liverpool 3

Bolton Wanderers 0 Manchester City 2

Newcastle United 1 Aston Villa 1

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I thought you being a little facetious Lady

> G. I might have put 2-2 on the predictions thingy

> but if I'm really honest I think Liverpool will

> win 3-1. We've had a good start under Harry

> Redknapp but the bubble will probably burst this

> weekend, mind you having said that Liverpool have

> got to lose at some point and I'm hoping it'll be

> this weekend against the Spurs.


Purely from a points situation I hope you win too! But don't tell Annasfield!

Everton 1 Fulham 1

Chelsea 3 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 2 Hull City 0

Middlesbrough 1 West Ham 2

Portsmouth 2 Wigan Athletic 2

Stoke City 0 Arsenal 1

West Bromwich 0 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 1 Liverpool 2

Bolton Wanderers 1 Manchester City 2

Newcastle United 0 Aston Villa 2



*edited: Whoops, west ham haven't kept a clean sheet in over 20 games

>>Simon M - Who was gloating? Was merely posting facts. embarrased smiley I know full well that getting carried away usually comes back to bite you on the arse.<<


What was "how many points behind top spot?" if not a little gloat eh? :) Come on, be honest! I did find the imagery in the second part of your comment a little disturbing mind you... B)


Everton 2 Fulham 0

Chelsea 4 Sunderland 0

Manchester United 3 Hull City 0

Middlesbrough 1 West Ham 0

Portsmouth 2 Wigan Athletic 0

Stoke City 0 Arsenal 2

West Bromwich 1 Blackburn Rovers 2

Tottenham Hotspur 2 Liverpool 1

Bolton Wanderers 0 Manchester City 2

Newcastle United 0 Aston Villa 2

It was a little - but it was just a reminder to the state of the table. There is no way I'm getting carried away, it will only lead to disappointment.


LadyGooner - Liverpool have aged me by about 5 years already this season. These late come backs are not good for the health and a 4-4 would probably finish me off. We've played 15 games this season and 8 of which I have witnessed first hand, I don't think I can take much more. We need to start making it a little easier for ourselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...