Jump to content
Everywhere

Heads up - Interesting threads in the main section

Keef

By Keef
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Administrator

Administrator

Posted
  • Administrator
Posted

- Person posted honest recommendation

- DulwichFox "called them out" for being dishonest and flagged up previous personal differences and brought up Louisa.

- I said I feel sad that person is picked on for an honest review and have a word with DulwichFox. (I've spoken to DF and all's well).

- *cue dark clouds, lightning and thunder* Louisa says she is picked on, say it's my choice when people can be disrespectful to other members of the forum and complains that honest people are favoured over her.


Louisa, you were confined to the Lounge for persistently taking threads off topic and reducing them to your thoughts on class and gentrification, it was making parts of the forum unpleasant for others. At least you now have your stage and your own personal spotlight focused on you in the Lounge, lighten up and enjoy it.

miga

miga

Posted
Posted

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see why DF and Louisa feel like they're

> being singled out - it's because they are.

>

> Whether this level of bile is justified or not, it

> seems like it's almost a rite of passage to have a

> go at them on the forum.


Just to further clarify this: I think it's particularly lame/weak/aesthetically unappealing when posters with no particular horse in the race pile in to take a pop at these two, once the point is well and truly made, as on this thread. "Me too sir, me too, I also think they were naughty, can I have a star?".

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Troll? Jeremy are you being sarcastic?


Not at all.


Your opinions are often valid - important, even. But then, you also post a lot of nonsense. Which many of us realise is a joke (albeit it an odd one), but the casual reader might not.

Grok

Grok

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being as most of the regulars that used to be the

> mythical clique no longer post, I'm interested to

> hear who "the same old cliquey names" are this

> week.


Numbers and *Bob* so far, as usual where DF&Lou are concerned.

>

> Anything can be construed one way or another.


Not when Lou has no right of reply in that section it cant.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Now look, Grok (aka "I agree with Foxy") I'm sick of 'the usual suspects' complaining about cliques on here, about how they gang up and share in-jokes and have exactly the same pov about EVERYTHING and probably often PM each other with who-smells-like-what jibes - and I'm NEVER included.


Never put in anyone's bloody clique.


What's wrong?! I wash!

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

I also think that at one time it seemed like people were emboldened and rushed to have a dig at Lou and/or foxy. But I can also see why Lou and foxy were doing people's heads in at that time.


I've always rather liked Lou's class war thing, and in some ways I've always been with her. Foxy is a good chap, but one who will not be proved wrong, even when he's been proved wrong, which can be grating. But I think both should be allowed to post wherever, there are far more abbrasive posters in the main section who seem to say what they like.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

Otta thanks for the kind words. I appreciate I had gotten on people's nerves, and probably still do. Being confined to the lounge just limits my audience so maybe that's why I'm tolerated more here. However, as admin knows only too well, my class related/gentrification comments are just the tip of the iceburg. You can confine me to the lounge, but you'll never silence me on the consequences of not acting upon this. The very people who have damaged this area are the types who post about dog mess, organic gift shops and hipster bread in the main section, hence why they hate me because I've got their number (and they know it). It infuriates them that someone like me exposes their hidden contempt for working class people, and I find that mildly amusing. As you rightly point out Otta, lots of smarmy loud mouths elsewhere on the forum who are never pulled up on their comments. I was picked on for one reason alone, my influence. Too much exposure in main the section. Wouldn't want the media catching on that not everyone is happy with gentrification now would we? And this person who foxy pulled up, only ever comments on businesses aimed at the new people who've settled around here. Funny that.


Louisa.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I was picked on for one reason

> alone, my influence. Too much exposure in main the

> section. Wouldn't want the media catching on



Don't worry, self-aggrandising delusional bollocks is fine here in the lounge. Carry on.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

*Bob* you will never receive a ban. Admin adores you, as do I. However, you need to be careful, the clique are circling us individuals waiting to pounce. Using positive business feedback on the forum as a guise to slowly erode away individuality and I believe admin is in on it too. Lots of cosying up earlier. The fox, a famous local face given official warning for exposing more undercover gentrification by the back door nonsense in the main section. Just be careful.


Louisa.

numbers

numbers

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I also think that at one time it seemed like

> people were emboldened and rushed to have a dig at

> Lou and/or foxy. But I can also see why Lou and

> foxy were doing people's heads in at that time.

>

> I've always rather liked Lou's class war thing,

> and in some ways I've always been with her. Foxy

> is a good chap, but one who will not be proved

> wrong, even when he's been proved wrong, which can

> be grating. But I think both should be allowed to

> post wherever, there are far more abbrasive

> posters in the main section who seem to say what

> they like.


What Otta said.


Or does that make me a cliquey fucker. Damn.

SLad

SLad

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is one of those times when someone with a

> justified gripe (I wouldn't be happy with people

> partying in the garden until 4am) manages to lose

> all sympathy.


Totally agree. Just hoping for the next instalment: when the alleged party house strikes back.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this related to your recent fall? :)

>

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9

>

> > ,1613316

> >

> > ?!?!?



:)) :)) :))


No, I was wearing flat shoes, if I wear heels I don't need an uneven paving stone to be likely to fall over :))


Just found that post really really odd!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Poundland East Dulwich soon to be replaced by Tesco Express

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • Moovart
      GROOMING GANGS INQUIRY VOTE The full list of 364 Labour, Green, and Independent MPs who voted AGAINST holding an inquiry into the systematic rape of young British girls

      By Moovart · Posted

      An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
    • first mate
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By first mate · Posted

      In recent consultation on further ED CPZ the majority of respondents were against. Fully appreciate you may not live on a road proposed for CPZ. If you are close to that area it is likely you will be affected by parking displacement if the CPZ goes in. I was just curious what James Barber's position on this is? Perhaps he'll come on here and let us know. He was always really good at visiting the forum.
    • MrCheeky
      GROOMING GANGS INQUIRY VOTE The full list of 364 Labour, Green, and Independent MPs who voted AGAINST holding an inquiry into the systematic rape of young British girls

      By MrCheeky · Posted

      huh  angry not at AII i think its  awsome to name n shame them  . as for me being right wing im very proud of it . does that mke yyou mad n get your BIood presure riseing?  sureIy you dont support chiId grooming or do you  ? i mean tommy robinson did teII you This was happening many yeras ago and of course there reaction was the same as yours .IabIed right wing and racist. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...