Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tatoos should only EVER be

>

> 1) The ship you serve on

> 2) The prison you're in

> 3) Your football team


Quids, I've a couple of tattoos that don't necessarily relate to the rules you apply.

Which are of course all situations where men are closely grouped together.

I think we both know, from our style of posting how utterly ferociously heterosexual we are.

At least in intent.

And I ask this in the spirit of, let's say camaradarie, but if you did fancy getting an MC Escher 'eating its own tail' style lizard tattoo, from the first Mott the Hoople record on your forearm, and say for argument's sake I might want to do the same, then maybe we could attend the same parlour at round about the same time.

What could be more straightforward? Honestly, there's some as will be thinking all sorts.

But not us obviously.

Why are the tattoo shops called parlours, by the way?

I reckon it might be if they started calling them 'pain shops' it might interfere with trade.

Some may see it as naff but I have the most beautifully designed big tarantula tattoo'd on my back.

Life size, proper colourful and with shadows.

Grown men have fainted when they see it. Well, whatever it takes....


Then I have a Happy Human logo on my upper arm!


But I do get your points and there are some very cheap and nasty tats around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone had any joy getting refunds for their cancelled kids' swimming lessons? I am constantly just getting a 'computer says no' response from Dulwich Leisure - quite how they think its okay to charge £42.40 per child without a service being given is beyond me! I will try emailing Portia too...
    • Just to clarify, this isn't the same cherry as last year, it's in the corner by the path that runs down to the crossroads of FHR / Colyton / Dunstans. It hasn't been an issue previously because the perimeter wasn't as large... I'm sure it must have been noticed & flagged during the various planning meetings, walkabouts etc and there is an ecological resolution planned that will avoid any damage to the tree. After all, Gala pride themselves on their environmental stance, being "nestled in the park" and everything... 🤦
    • Those branches are going to get chopped...again. All of this shows the central paradox at the heart of Southwark's greening the streets policy. What is the good of planting trees in tarmac if you are simultaneously wrecking large sections of the park and stopping locals using the park? It just does not make sense. Cllr Catherine Rose should be made to answer for Gala conduct, if they are already flouting the terms of their agreement.
    • All, I have had bad experiences with scaffolders in the past. They have a hard job and sometimes damage your house by accident. The way they deal with it after this is usually what remains in their customers' minds...... and I have used a few different companies across last 12 years as a customer. I don't know if it is an exception, but I found LDS scaffolding's guys really good: Discrete, focused and on time. Their comms was ok. I have made sure I saved their contacts and will use them again. Prices felt fair. LEE GORE 07931642467  DEAN PRICE 07940531370  Olivier
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...