Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tatoos should only EVER be

>

> 1) The ship you serve on

> 2) The prison you're in

> 3) Your football team


Quids, I've a couple of tattoos that don't necessarily relate to the rules you apply.

Which are of course all situations where men are closely grouped together.

I think we both know, from our style of posting how utterly ferociously heterosexual we are.

At least in intent.

And I ask this in the spirit of, let's say camaradarie, but if you did fancy getting an MC Escher 'eating its own tail' style lizard tattoo, from the first Mott the Hoople record on your forearm, and say for argument's sake I might want to do the same, then maybe we could attend the same parlour at round about the same time.

What could be more straightforward? Honestly, there's some as will be thinking all sorts.

But not us obviously.

Why are the tattoo shops called parlours, by the way?

I reckon it might be if they started calling them 'pain shops' it might interfere with trade.

Some may see it as naff but I have the most beautifully designed big tarantula tattoo'd on my back.

Life size, proper colourful and with shadows.

Grown men have fainted when they see it. Well, whatever it takes....


Then I have a Happy Human logo on my upper arm!


But I do get your points and there are some very cheap and nasty tats around.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...