Jump to content

Recommended Posts

IQ tends to be tested under exam conditions, involving no verbal communication but in life I believe we are judged by friends and peers on our communication skills and ability to talk around subjects and express our thoughts verbally.


Which is more valuable skill in life, strong analytical/logical skills, or verbal communication skills.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12208-what-is-intelligence/
Share on other sites

I would say that verbal skills are more important, for exactly the reasons PGC said.


Sadly enough, I think I'm fairly intelligent in an analytical sort of way, but I'm resorting to "what she said" on a forum. Oh dear, that proves my point.


And if anyone has any tips on how to persuade people, I'm listening...

If you were, eg, a rocket scientist and had to work out the best trajectory to the moon, you'd probably want more than Ted max or honaloochie like verbal skills to poetically and memorably say, 'right, i'd like this big pointy thing to go to the big round light in the sky'.


The worlds big, there's room for all sorts of intelligence, and if you believe the press then it would seem even Rooney Gazza was a genius apparently!!

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you were, eg, a rocket scientist and had to

> work out the best trajectory to the moon, you'd

> probably want more than Ted max or honaloochie

> like verbal skills to poetically and memorably

> say, 'right, i'd like this big pointy thing to go

> to the big round light in the sky'.

>

Seen, geez.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interestingly just seen the gazza story, so we

> might have to add comedy to his more usual

> sporting genius accolades.


I think he already had a comedic streak, MP.

Have you not heard his version of The Fog On The Tyne?

It's genuinely and intentionally funny to my ears.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> As a direct answer to your question Mick I would

> say the latter given the number of bullshi**ers

> I've come across in life who appear to have done

> well for themselves.


Seems to a large number of them in Westminster anyways.

hmm intelligence imo is the ability to understand information and to then reinterpret it. Genius is the ability to rewrite it and the ability to commmunicate it is just well...good communication skills.


But seeing as we live in a world where having a big pair of bristols will earn you more having a first class maths degree then who really gives a f*ck.


>:D<

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But seeing as we live in a world where having a

> big pair of bristols will earn you more having a

> first class maths degree then who really gives a

> f*ck.


Well, a first class physics degree won't necessarily make you a millionaire, even if you did invent the web.


But knowing some shit about shit, even if that means dropping out of university, can be pretty lucrative - just ask Bill Gates, Steve Jobs or Mark Zuckerberg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...