Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was involved in a hit and run accident on East Dulwich Grove , Lordship Lane end. It happened on 22December 14. I suffered multiple fractures to my right leg and a ligament damage to my left shoulder and a nasty bang to my head. I was hospitalised for almost two weeks, missed Christmas with my family and it caused a lot of worry to my loved ones.


There have been quite a few concerns on here regarding this junction and I have seen a few near misses since my accident.


There is a petition going on to make this a safer place but unfortunately 500 signatures are needed, I've managed to get 55. If you live in the area and use this junction you'll probably know how dangerous it is to cross here.


Please could I ask you to sign this petition so I can continue to ask for help to make this safer , somehow.


Thank you


Freda Grehan

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/safer-lordship-lane


135 signatures so far. Need a good few more, please sign if you agree that this junction is not safe and needs making safer. 400 odd have read the post and a good few have signed but we need a lot more. Please feel free to share on Facebook and amongst friends and family. Thank you - Freda

Thank you so much for signing!!

20 more signatures in an hour and a half, please pass it on to friends and family, I'm sure it's possible to get another 426 signatures on here, for the safety of our friends and family.


Thank you


Freda Grehan.

signed.


but I guess if one wants to use these registration sites then it would be an error to think that they should be free at the point of use in a world where governments (here local, but the point carries forward to general) are frightened wit-less by popular democracy.

I will sign this. Southwark already have data on the dangerous speed of traffic on this road ( http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/13539/melbourne_grove_south_safety_review_and_feasibility_study_report ) (page 8)sop if they don't do something it will be bordering on negligence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...