Jump to content

Recommended Posts

>>I should imagine they want to open in a blaze of glory, windows (sorry - giant plasma screens) packed to the rafters >>with property - so they need time to get the clients in.:D<


Got my third letter again today too....again addressed to me personally, ignoring the fact SWMBO also owns the place....

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't it Foxtons who have made a fine "art" of

> "flyboarding". So you might see your house up for

> sale in their windows even if you have not

> actually put in on the market!


Excellent. I wonder what it will go for..?

It does look better than a derelict shop front but it is still fuking ugly.


And sorry to bring this up again, I know it has been done to death but; Allowing estate agents, in their current form, to exist at all is like tolerating a bunch of rude pushy cunts who walk around the aisles in the supermarket, tell you what you can and can?t buy, force you to a teller of their choice and then rob you.


But then again we tolerate being robbed by banks, insurance companies and government every day. We are so used to bending and taking it that we actually convince ourselves that it is all for the best. Like a dog who gets kicked repeatedly and still cowers back to lick its master?s hand.


So now we are all mildly ambivalent to the fact that another estate agent opening. We try to be rational, not be melodramatic. We had our initial rants so let?s see what they are like. Take the good with the bad, if you don?t laugh you?ll cry and a bird in the bush is great until the parky catches you etc. etc.


We live in a freeish market so everyone has the right to ply their trade and peddle their wares and if others are fool enough to fall for it then fair play. But we really have to stay guarded to markets being manipulated by specific industries. The banks already have complete control of us. Who is next?


Well that was a cathartic Monday morning rant. Sorry if it gets this loonged.

Honestly.. it's really is just an estate agent. Check it out. They're not supplying munitions to African dictatorships, or 'disappearing' political activists, or burgling your houses, or stealing the food from your children's mouths (ok, the last one is debatable) but do check it out.

It's just, like, houses for sale, or to rent. Like all the other Estate agents. I know they have a big glass frontage, and they have a plasma screen instead of scabby faded photographs like some of the agents have. You'll probably end-up looking at it when you're waiting for a bus. And the minis are irritating - but they're just cars, really, aren't they? Not the AIDS virus.


All we had before was a brick wall and 15 other companies doing exactly the same thing.

Peckham native Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Foxtons 0% offer just dropped through the door.

> First 200 who instruct them to sell their property

> and sell it before 21st December pay no

> commission.


But for those of us who are not selling and received these letters, (I received 7 - I'm not joking!) anyone fancy joining me and gathering them together, and then in the first week they open, put all the damn envelopes back through their door?

LostThePlot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> But for those of us who are not selling and

> received these letters, (I received 7 - I'm not

> joking!) anyone fancy joining me and gathering

> them together, and then in the first week they

> open, put all the damn envelopes back through

> their door?


Why not just pop them in the blue recycling bag and and forget about it?

WAIT...! I have an idea..


LostThePlot.. you take three of your 7 letters round to Asset so s(he) doesn't feel left-out. Then you can both march down to Foxtons together and post your unwanted mail through the door, and watch the office dogsbody get down on his hands and knees and pick them up, whilst the manager pins-up details of the hundreds of new properties they've just taken-on.


That'll teach 'em!

whats do you guys think of the foxtons deal if I sell through them and get an offer by

christmas then its no comission.If it goes on till after christmas and no offers 2.5%?

Theres prob small print as well if I gave another agent and they sold it ill be paying double

comission


What if they delberately dont market it and ask me for 2.5% Thid idea makes me a bit unconfortable.

2.5% is astronomical.Dont know whether to just for a hight street agent for just 1.2%

At this moment, in ED, if they can't sell it for you before Christmas, they ought to be ashamed of themselves.


However.. I can't remember exactly what the small print said, but I was under the impression it just had to be 'sale agreed' before Xmas.. if it completed in the New Year then you'd still be entitled?

>>However.. I can't remember exactly what the small print said, but I was under the impression it just had to be 'sale agreed' before Xmas.. if it completed in the New Year then you'd still be entitled?<<


I cannot remember the full wording either, but think you have it right. Could it really be the case though that, if you and Buyer A agree the sale/purchase before Christams, then Buyer A backs out in January but you subsequently agree and complete a sale to Buyer B in February, then there will still be no commission payable? :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...