Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed how it seems that on Platform 1 (London Bridge bound) of the East Dulwich train station they seem to have replaced the seating (excellent) but have forgotten to replace the ones other than under the covered area (not excellent). This results in about 5 less benches in connection with an upgrade of others. Can this really be true?

Hi


Sophia is right, I wouldnt do that......I would not leave you without seating, they have been removed in preperation for the new ones being put in place, in total 12 new benches, plus the new additional shelter which is now on order


Kind regards


Barry





davewines Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone noticed how it seems that on Platform 1

> (London Bridge bound) of the East Dulwich train

> station they seem to have replaced the seating

> (excellent) but have forgotten to replace the ones

> other than under the covered area (not excellent).

> This results in about 5 less benches in connection

> with an upgrade of others. Can this really be

> true?

Hi


A little confused by the posting on a couple of points, the original shelters are still there so you wouldn't get wet, the additional one is on order so that would not make a difference due to the fact you have never had it and the 12 new benches are in place. I have been to ED to start checking the works and noticed they are all there


The works will be finished this weekend, the contractors are slightly behind as they need to switch off the power to finish the trackside graffiti and white edges to platforms and only have a small window to complete these works


Regards


B Jones

Area Station Manager



Easties EL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's taking almost 3 weeks now to get those bloody

> seats done. What happens if it rains tomorrow?

AMAZING HOW UPTIGHT SOME PEOPLE ARE BEING ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO SIT DOWN FOR 5 MINS BEFORE A TRAIN ARRIVES - JEEZUZ !!

I KNOW IT'S A CONVENIENCE TO DO SO BUT HARDLY CHANGES YOUR LIFE TO HAVE SOME SEATS REPLACED DOES IT !!

PREGNANT / OLD / DISABLED FOLKS EXCEPTED, TO A DEGREE.

Easties EL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well. It was ruddy well raining a few days back

> and the shelter was taped off, due to the seats

> still being worked on. Which gave me the flu/cold

> (it didn't really, but could of)

>

> :)-D


xxxxxxx


Yeh, it would be better if they never bothered trying to improve the station, it's so inconvenient - not to mention a risk to health - while they're doing it :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...