Jump to content

OK, yes you "It's The W**F Lottery" pick a number between 1 & 3724


Recommended Posts

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OIH, WMTD STOP COCKING ABOUT!

>

> Where's my 71 going in all of this?


-------------------------------------------


*Tisk* H...



Lucky for you my "in Nidd" cards are elsewhere....



Anyway, calm yourself...


FRIDAY NITE is http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514rC2cAsRL._SL500_AA300_.jpg"W**FLottery Drawer Nite "



"Keep em peeled"


71 could be L*U*C*K*Y





W**F

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For those of you who unfortunately missed out on

> selecting 1729, I'm now willing to consider offers

> for shares in it.

_____________________________


Ianr


Jeezzz, everyone knows BLUE is bad


Come back with a different colour



* licks finger *



W**F

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh frig.....did someone say christmas????

>

> i choose number 185 for charlies.

>

> i choose number 199 for brum and number 1997 for

> katienumbers. hope that is ok with willywoofter?


karter I assume you mean moi? thanks if so


w-ell .....did someone say Christmas?

I will choose a very lucky, WINNING 79* for you (is that okay Woof?)


PS. am I allowed to choose extra numbers for other people now that I am out of 'nidd' and not offering limited edition chilli sauces via PM**





*and if anyone can work out why 79 is classed as a winner, I will buy them a rice cooker/drink/delete as applicable


** see private messages for latest selection

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What did i pick again?


________________________________


Probably your nose ?


Though of course ( as you've been following each & every turn of this W**FLotto thread ) you know you can have an EXTRA turn



"So, pick away MicMac"



W**F

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you'll get 'way' more than a rice cooker for that

> remark which surely contravenes section 3 sub para

> 4.2a of the game


not to mention s4.3.1(iii)©...the cheeky dog! Want me to blacken its other eye Lady Katharina Van Der Wotsit?

And speaking of cheeky dogs - OY, FLEABAG! It has not escaped my notice that you awarded The Queen an extra ball. Well I would like an extra ball too on the ground that I happen to be her Lady in Waiting.


Incidentally, if I am not mistaken, I believe I am entitled to a fourth ball.


So, may I have 300 and 400 please.


Get to it FLEABAG!

Hold up..


I'm in talks to have a "known person" of TV fame to draw one of the winning numbers


Really, it's true & I'll keep you posted


Now, I have noticed that some esteemed Forumites haven't taken up the chance to play the W**FLotto, so I'm giving others a chance to " nominate " on their behalf


To get the ball rolling I'm giving Sean M/Gab big 69'r


* he'll love it *



W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...