Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just had a courier come to my door with a mobile phone with my exact address, but addressed to Mr Mohammed [surname witheld].


The courier said that this is now a common fraud, and he has had 20 or so packages like this recently in ED.


Apparently, someone pays for the goods with a fake/compromised credit card online, tracks the progress of the package using a smart phone then waits outside the address they have used until the driver has delivered the package. Then they turn up at the door with a story about "just having moved to this street" and "used the wrong door nu". They then try and take the phone from you after spinning their lame little deceit and drive off. Meanwhile, a day or so later, you get stung with the bill for the item, having signed and accepted it.


Just thought it may be worth mentioning here.


I'll be letting the local Police know too.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12728-courier-related-fraud-in-ed/
Share on other sites

Yes this is really common. I had someone apply for a mobile phone contract in my name from O2 and O2 swore blind the phone was delivered to my address. It won't be stamped out until there is a code established whereby couriers don't hand over goods on the doorstep. The courier should refuse to give goods to anyone who isn't INSIDE the property. NO EXCEPTIONS. If someone is hanging around outside waiting for the delivery then it's FRAUD.
I had UPS deliver a parcel to me last week. I hadn't ordered anything but signed for it and then called the sender, to find that it was meant for another address (so it was a genuine mistake, not fraud)- they emailed me the correct label and sent a courier to collect it - which is what any company will do if you are sent a parcel by mistake. So never hand anything you've signed for over to a stranger.

OK I've re-read the OP's post and my fraud was slightly different. Someone applied for a new phone contract using my name and address. The phone is delivered and the fraudster hangs around OUTSIDE and when the courier arrives he says something like "I've locked myself out" or "you've just caught me on the way out". Anything to get the courier to hand over the package on the doorstep. It should be a code of practice that nothing gets handed over on the doorstep. The courier should only give something to someone who is INSIDE of the delivery property.


I am a fairly trusting person but where packages and couriers are concerned I'm very cautious and take nothing at face value. There are just so many fraudsters out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
    • In recent consultation on further ED CPZ the majority of respondents were against. Fully appreciate you may not live on a road proposed for CPZ. If you are close to that area it is likely you will be affected by parking displacement if the CPZ goes in. I was just curious what James Barber's position on this is? Perhaps he'll come on here and let us know. He was always really good at visiting the forum.
    • huh  angry not at AII i think its  awsome to name n shame them  . as for me being right wing im very proud of it . does that mke yyou mad n get your BIood presure riseing?  sureIy you dont support chiId grooming or do you  ? i mean tommy robinson did teII you This was happening many yeras ago and of course there reaction was the same as yours .IabIed right wing and racist. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...