Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Should panties be worn over or under ones tights -

> and why?


first of all, look in the mirror and ask yourself the following question:


"Do I have Superhero powers?"


If not, then the answer is probably no.

erm... I was trying to stay out of this thread but it was nice to see a posting from HAL80000000000 (ha - two can play at that game) so I thought I'd offer a *witty* response


I *honestly* don't know the answer HonaloochieB. Can I have a 'get out of jail' card for this question please....seeing as its nearly Sunday and all :)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> erm... I was trying to stay out of this thread but

> it was nice to see a posting from HAL80000000000


I too am chuffed to see a posting from HAL2000000, Katie9887636. It's been a while.


As to whether superheroes are tight-arsed, I really do think this is one of those questions worthy of debate in the Drawing Room.

Science answers the question: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?


Personally - I'm not convinced. I think this 'discovery' must have been announced on a slow news day. Fishes were laying eggs half a billion years before any terrestrial ancestor of the chicken had evolved. The egg definitely came first.


The cited scientific paper actually refers to the discovery of the protein that helps modern birds make hard, lightweight egg-shell from crystalline calcium carbonate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...