Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy, does that mean you work in banking or some

> related part of financial services? VP = senior

> manager, but in reality no one senior speaks to

> you until you make Director.


Yes but in a strictly peripheral role... it's pretty rare anyone speaks to me at all during the working day, and that's just the way I like it.

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm going for an adjustment to my own title

> >

> > From here on in I'm having this on my

> 'imaginary'

> > business card.....

> >

> > Seabag Major

> > Director & General Bell-End

> >

> > I'll lead, the team will have to follow.

>

>

> Cheese importer - sorry, couldn't resist!


I prefer Cheese Smuggler Lady Norwood

I think treat them as food additives, so a person looking after clients is a client-stabiliser or customer-emulsifier (E113 or E109) someone who procures new business is a 'permitted profit preservative' (E818) and you can style yourself 100% original, artisan, hand-fondled, organic ingredient (or E001).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jeremy, does that mean you work in banking or

> some

> > related part of financial services? VP = senior

> > manager, but in reality no one senior speaks to

> > you until you make Director.

>

> Yes but in a strictly peripheral role... it's

> pretty rare anyone speaks to me at all during the

> working day, and that's just the way I like it.


I'm similar to you Jeremy, but the fuckers won't stop talking to me.

My company has "directors" - basically slightly senior but nothing special. A few years ago one of them was arrested. This got us a lot of bad press coverage during the trial because the papers quoted his job title as if he was on our board.


We have dozens and dozens of directors.

Big Head


Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm going for an adjustment to my own title

>

> From here on in I'm having this on my 'imaginary'

> business card.....

>

> Seabag Major

> Director & General Bell-End

>

> I'll lead, the team will have to follow.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Grok, next time you accuse someone of bullying on

> the forum, I'll remind you of your uncalled for

> recent posts to Jeremy...



Yeah and he called me big head, whereas it should have been 'dick head'


As it goes, I do wear the largest sized hat

Are there any Dilbert readers about? I used to work for Dilbert-reading IT techy types a long time ago and this thread has just reminded me about it.


Cannot seem to paste the images (again), do a search on dilbert job titles you get the picture :))


a random job title generator is what you need.


oh another thing this thread has reminded me of. Anyone who has watched Chewin' the fat will understand the "Good guy"/"wank". I know which one Jeremy is ;-)

Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'Tis a job title, as requested. And if the cap

> fits....

>

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Yeah and he called me big head, whereas it

> should

> > have been 'dick head'

> >

> > As it goes, I do wear the largest sized hat



Still living in "cabbage head's" shadow then


He must be getting on now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I know the couple you mean, and she has always been friendly and smiley when delivering to me, but obviously in a hurry, for all the reasons outlined in the thread. My gate is always open, however (unless someone coming to the house closes it when they leave). I can't see the point of gates that have to be opened and shut again every time someone comes to the house. It just seems a waste of time, and it's annoying if you are carrying stuff. And a closed gate  conveys a sort of "my house is my fortress" feel. To me, anyway.
    • Thanks for posting this. Really interesting. It would be good if you added a star rating, so that it was easier to do comparisons / see what your top recommendations are. Great blog though!
    • Hi, Just a quick note to say it's six months since I launched Eats Dulwich. In that time I've reviewed 28 restaurants. Usually four or five a month except for a month when I came down with gout, which I guess is an occupational hazard. Don't say I don't suffer for my art. Early on someone – Sue, I think – asked me what I'm going to do when I've reviewed every restaurant in East Dulwich. I'm nowhere near that point, but what I have found is that a lot of new openings have tended to be in Rye Lane, so the site has expanded to cover SE15, hence the slight change of name (still haven't had any cease and desist letters from anything with a similar name).  Anyway, the site is still free, it would be great if as many readers as possible here can subscribe so that they automatically get new posts (when you try to subscribe the default might be paid subs but that's down to Substack, just tick the free option instead) as I don't post everything on EDF. Obviously you can get reviews elsewhere if you want, but I think this is the only proper site for local East Dulwich people written by a local East Dulwich person. If you like eating out please have a read. And if there are other places you think I should visit please mention them below and i'll do my best to try them. Link here: https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/  
    • Can you explain what your point was, then? Because it isn't clear to me. No. Perhaps you could provide a link and explain its relevance? That would be helpful     Those figures suggest that over 10,000,000 voters were not "rejecting a far left party."
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...