Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy, does that mean you work in banking or some

> related part of financial services? VP = senior

> manager, but in reality no one senior speaks to

> you until you make Director.


Yes but in a strictly peripheral role... it's pretty rare anyone speaks to me at all during the working day, and that's just the way I like it.

LadyNorwood Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm going for an adjustment to my own title

> >

> > From here on in I'm having this on my

> 'imaginary'

> > business card.....

> >

> > Seabag Major

> > Director & General Bell-End

> >

> > I'll lead, the team will have to follow.

>

>

> Cheese importer - sorry, couldn't resist!


I prefer Cheese Smuggler Lady Norwood

I think treat them as food additives, so a person looking after clients is a client-stabiliser or customer-emulsifier (E113 or E109) someone who procures new business is a 'permitted profit preservative' (E818) and you can style yourself 100% original, artisan, hand-fondled, organic ingredient (or E001).

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jeremy, does that mean you work in banking or

> some

> > related part of financial services? VP = senior

> > manager, but in reality no one senior speaks to

> > you until you make Director.

>

> Yes but in a strictly peripheral role... it's

> pretty rare anyone speaks to me at all during the

> working day, and that's just the way I like it.


I'm similar to you Jeremy, but the fuckers won't stop talking to me.

My company has "directors" - basically slightly senior but nothing special. A few years ago one of them was arrested. This got us a lot of bad press coverage during the trial because the papers quoted his job title as if he was on our board.


We have dozens and dozens of directors.

Big Head


Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm going for an adjustment to my own title

>

> From here on in I'm having this on my 'imaginary'

> business card.....

>

> Seabag Major

> Director & General Bell-End

>

> I'll lead, the team will have to follow.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Grok, next time you accuse someone of bullying on

> the forum, I'll remind you of your uncalled for

> recent posts to Jeremy...



Yeah and he called me big head, whereas it should have been 'dick head'


As it goes, I do wear the largest sized hat

Are there any Dilbert readers about? I used to work for Dilbert-reading IT techy types a long time ago and this thread has just reminded me about it.


Cannot seem to paste the images (again), do a search on dilbert job titles you get the picture :))


a random job title generator is what you need.


oh another thing this thread has reminded me of. Anyone who has watched Chewin' the fat will understand the "Good guy"/"wank". I know which one Jeremy is ;-)

Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'Tis a job title, as requested. And if the cap

> fits....

>

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Yeah and he called me big head, whereas it

> should

> > have been 'dick head'

> >

> > As it goes, I do wear the largest sized hat



Still living in "cabbage head's" shadow then


He must be getting on now

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...