Jump to content

Old photos of front of Dulwich DIY wanted

Minitoots

By Minitoots
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

nxjen

nxjen

Posted
Posted

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Whether this is a practice that has gone

> unchallenged for many years or whether individual

> businesses have negotiated with Southwark for

> which there may be a rental cost is an important

> dstinction.


I think the point is that the shops are displaying goods / setting up seating on what falls within the boundaries of their own property, so there's a reason it's gone unchallenged and the Council have no right to charge rental. If they want to keep that part of the pavement clear, then the Council should be paying compensation to the shopkeepers.

cella

cella

Posted
Posted

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cella Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Whether this is a practice that has gone

> > unchallenged for many years or whether

> individual

> > businesses have negotiated with Southwark for

> > which there may be a rental cost is an

> important

> > dstinction.

>

> I think the point is that the shops are displaying

> goods / setting up seating on what falls within

> the boundaries of their own property, so there's a

> reason it's gone unchallenged and the Council have

> no right to charge rental. If they want to keep

> that part of the pavement clear, then the Council

> should be paying compensation to the shopkeepers.


It doesn't seem clear from the original post whether businesses do own the pavement space in front as presumably Southwark wouldn't need to ask for evidence of displays over 10 years if this is the case with this shop - they could display what they wanted on their "land" surely? My point is that pedestrians deserve consideration too and if this is public space then it should all be available to accommodate the increase in footfall.

adonirum

adonirum

Posted
Posted

Had a read, tried to, but couldn't resist...again......damn......


rendelharris you have quoted my post, so, yes, the body language and tone of voice was extremely important and, indeed, integral to me during my working life. You interpreted something somebody wrote as racist, even when supported by "evidence". I have heard the remark (on many occasions throughout my life) about loud music "sounds like an arab bazaar" or even "a persian market". I have never interpreted remarks like that as racist, more like an oft quoted old adage. I quoted someone asking a question and then answering it, so your questioning that part of my post and attempting to draw a parallel is wholly fatuous. Indeed " so wrapped up in your own importance, that you don't even realise what you are writing".


Finally, you refer to "your good self". Thank you for paying due deference. It is, of course, entirely apposite.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

adonirum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Had a read, tried to, but couldn't

> resist...again......damn......

>

You interpreted something somebody

> wrote as racist, even when supported by

> "evidence".


You may wish to edit this?

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

richard tudor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well apparently I've interpreted something as

> > racist, supported by evidence. Suits me.

>

>

> I think I have missed this evidence. what was it?


You haven't missed any evidence, Richard (lovely to see you're still bitterly following me around by the way, missed you sweetie) - you and adonirum have both managed to conclusively miss the point though. Ain't no thing.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

Duvaller Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> This is a problem that Dulwich DIY have made for

> themselves. It has hints of New Delhi where shop

> building extensions encroach on the pavements so

> much so that pedestrians have to walk in the

> gutter.

>



OK I've not taken much notice of this thread for a while, but having revisited it I've properly seen the above.


And putting in my twopennorth, I think it's racist too.


"Hints of New Delhi"? WTF? Why on earth would anybody bring New Delhi into a thread about a shop in East Dulwich?


And what have building extensions and pedestrians having to "walk in the gutter" got to do with the situation here?


Oh, hang on ......

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

I don't get it...


If shop owners starting hanging neon signs precariously hanging 2m over the road, and someone said "Lordship Lane is starting to resemble Hong Kong".. would that be racist?


If there was a row of empty shops, and someone said "Lordship Lane is starting to resemble Hartlepool". Would that be racist?

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If shop owners starting hanging neon signs

> precariously hanging 2m over the road, and someone

> said "Lordship Lane is starting to resemble Hong

> Kong".. would that be racist?


If the shop owners were Chinese then yes, I'd suspect there was a racist element. Why couldn't the poster here say "it's starting to resemble East Street market" or "Beginning to look like Petticoat Lane" - no, chose to describe an Asian business' street display as "hints of New Dehli" - even though his own description of New Dehli, "building extensions encroach onto the pavement" is totally inapposite to the East Dulwich situation.

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

Yes, seemed at best racially insensitive to me. Hopefully the offending poster will choose his words more carefully in future.


Anyway, back on topic. This external display has never presented a problem at all and has been there for years. I see no good reason for it to be removed or any justification for Southwark council to extort. It's an incredibly useful shop and deserves its place on LL. The display I'm sure would attract people who might not otherwise notice the shop and therefore help it to stay afloat in a street with a dwindling number of independent shops.

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

On EDF yes it's petty, it happens all the time, worn the badge myself a few times (as well as mysoginist, sexist, whatever, yawn).

Many people on here generally (like any forum I suppose) flap their gums in a way they wouldn't face to face, because obviously they've anonymity.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On EDF yes it's petty, it happens all the time,

> worn the badge myself a few times (as well as

> mysoginist, sexist, whatever, yawn).

> Many people on here generally (like any forum I

> suppose) flap their gums in a way they wouldn't

> face to face, because obviously they've anonymity.


Rendel Harris unfortunately is my real name and I don't say anything on here I wouldn't say face to face.


(Sorry to be off topic again but you know, threads do develop...)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Dawson Heights again

      By Sue · Posted

      Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertises times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • Sue
      Be careful in local shops

      By Sue · Posted

      People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
    • malumbu
      Bitey Fox.

      By malumbu · Posted

      Adapted not forced.  As have numerous species around the world.  Sort of thing that Attenborough features.  Domestic dogs another good example - hung around communities for food and then we become the leader of the pack.  Not sure how long it will take foxes to domesticate, but some will be well on their way.    Raccoons also on the way https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1j8j48e5z2o
    • Jenijenjen
      Excellent Christmas meal at Franklins!

      By Jenijenjen · Posted

      My memory, admittedly not very reliable these days, places the shop on the block on the left hand side just before Burgess Park going towards Camberwell. Have also found a reference to Franklins Antiques being located at 157 Camberwell Road which is on that block. This is a screen shot obtained from Google maps of that address which accords with my memory except the entrance door was on the right hand side, where the grey door is, rather than in the centre.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...