Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Anyone got a link? I had a mooch on the site but

> couldn't find anything


guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced 'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler ....


hope russ is having a great 'holiday' eh?

>guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced >'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler >....


Is the naked woman emerging from the sleeping bag on page 16 of Seven definitely airbrushed? Looks like it to me from the thumbnail, even without my magnifying glass. http://dailytelegraph.newspaperdirect.com/screenprint/viewer.aspx

Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....


What did people really think about the article on page 56?


I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a mention or were you expecting it to be more like A, B and C ...?


* yours interestedly *


Katie


(yours discalculia-ly)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?

>

> I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a

> mention or were you expecting it to be more like

> A, B and C ...?

>

> * yours interestedly *

>

> Katie

>

> (yours discalculia-ly)

__________________________________________________


Actually..



I'd have expected W(**F) X Y & Z



Wouldn't you ?


( i'm so over it now though )



* checks mirror *


" Hold on "



W**F

I bought a copy of the Sunday telegraph at Terminal 5 yesterday, went right the way through the magazines and papers whilst waiting. Nothing, nada, nicht. I texted a friend on here later to see if they had found anything, same result. Unless of course there is a smarte ar$e out there that has found it.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?



I'm confused now. Was there really some article or was it all bullshit?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

> >

> > What did people really think about the article

> on

> > page 56?

>

>

> I'm confused now. Was there really some article or

> was it all bullshit?


oops sorry B, it was all bull (including my post, there's no page 56) :-$

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, well, I'm now back, a little jet lagged which is why I am posting at a slightly strange hour, but to cut to the chase, the article wasn't published as you all found out when you looked for it (thank you for being interested enough to actually look for it though).


Shortly after I'd set off on my vacation I got a call from my editor saying that the piece wasn't going to be included as originally intended due to another feature becoming more extensive than originally anticipated.


But the good news is that it will now be published in next Sunday's paper! I won't be away that weekend so look forward to discussing it with you lot on the day or soon after.


Sorry for the anti-climax! I know some people were looking forward to reading it. But you don't have to wait much longer now!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...