Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Anyone got a link? I had a mooch on the site but

> couldn't find anything


guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced 'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler ....


hope russ is having a great 'holiday' eh?

>guys there is nothing in the Torygraph magazine apart from the usual interesting recipes and wine reviews, over-priced >'fashion', interior design and this weekend, an article on 'Big hair, small egos' and the confessions of a monkey smuggler >....


Is the naked woman emerging from the sleeping bag on page 16 of Seven definitely airbrushed? Looks like it to me from the thumbnail, even without my magnifying glass. http://dailytelegraph.newspaperdirect.com/screenprint/viewer.aspx

Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....


What did people really think about the article on page 56?


I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a mention or were you expecting it to be more like A, B and C ...?


* yours interestedly *


Katie


(yours discalculia-ly)

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?

>

> I mean, were you surprised that X, Y and Z got a

> mention or were you expecting it to be more like

> A, B and C ...?

>

> * yours interestedly *

>

> Katie

>

> (yours discalculia-ly)

__________________________________________________


Actually..



I'd have expected W(**F) X Y & Z



Wouldn't you ?


( i'm so over it now though )



* checks mirror *


" Hold on "



W**F

I bought a copy of the Sunday telegraph at Terminal 5 yesterday, went right the way through the magazines and papers whilst waiting. Nothing, nada, nicht. I texted a friend on here later to see if they had found anything, same result. Unless of course there is a smarte ar$e out there that has found it.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

>

> What did people really think about the article on

> page 56?



I'm confused now. Was there really some article or was it all bullshit?

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh-kay, now lets talk seriously about this ....

> >

> > What did people really think about the article

> on

> > page 56?

>

>

> I'm confused now. Was there really some article or

> was it all bullshit?


oops sorry B, it was all bull (including my post, there's no page 56) :-$

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, well, I'm now back, a little jet lagged which is why I am posting at a slightly strange hour, but to cut to the chase, the article wasn't published as you all found out when you looked for it (thank you for being interested enough to actually look for it though).


Shortly after I'd set off on my vacation I got a call from my editor saying that the piece wasn't going to be included as originally intended due to another feature becoming more extensive than originally anticipated.


But the good news is that it will now be published in next Sunday's paper! I won't be away that weekend so look forward to discussing it with you lot on the day or soon after.


Sorry for the anti-climax! I know some people were looking forward to reading it. But you don't have to wait much longer now!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...