Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was moving house on Saturday and when were loading up, the lovely parking people slapped a penalty notice pocket on the other side of the van (sneakily so we didn't see them doing it when we were coming in /out to load up) but the pocket was empty - ie there was no actual penalty notice in there. (We were parked in a lane but slightly over a white line as this was the only place we could park up without obstructing anyone - we couldn't have done the move otherwise).


Anyone got any experience of empty penalty pockets and appealing these? Is this valid ground for appeal?

How can you appeal what you did not get?

Result!


I once got given a ticket inside an envelope which said on its outside, "This is not a fine, but a warning". But inside was the ticket telling me to pay. So I appealed and they decided it should be cancelled due to a 'technical reason'. Technically, they gave me the wrong envelope ;)


Ask them for a copy of the ticket he gave you. No, wait, they might be able to do that!

exactly! Knowing how sneaky they are, I called them today to check if they had anything on their system and they gave me a reference number and confirmed there was a fine due (and that whilst they're not required by law to speak to you if you are there they are supposed to draw any violation to your attention, I was told they should speak to you as part of 'customer service'!!)


I've no idea how I prove that there wasn't anything in there but there definitely wasn't! (I'm not disputing the mild parking violation but the lack of an actual fine notice I hope means it was not valid). Hopefully mine will be cancelled for a'technical reason' too.

to enforce the fine they must have photographic evidence of the parking ticket (the actual ticket not just the sleeve) placed somewhere on your windscreen or vehicle. Ask them to provide this evidence to you, if they cannot then they have no proof there was ever a ticket in there and you shoudl be able to get off it.
I'd appeal and hope that common sense prevails. Was the wheel over the white line? If so that's what they'll argue on. The warden would have taken pictures too (they all do now) so it would have been obvious too that you were offloading. Definitely a case of over zealous ticketting imo and slyly dones as well, as had you seen the warden you could have moved the van. I'd definitely appeal.

Thanks Dubluke and DJKilla Queen.


Yes I was over the white line so technicially a violation. Over zealous is an understatement, and I'm annoyed they snuck the envelope on the far side without speaking to us as it was clear what we were doing.


I will definitely ask them for the photographic evidence of the notice and not just the envelope. I've sent the letter off (their on-line appeals system is down...!) and will let you all know how it goes.

You probably interrupted a well known desperate parking warden scam to get around observation time issues.


"Every photo is date stamped via the camera so if a PA come across any vehicle offending

they could set the camera 10 minutes or so fast - log the details in of the

vehicle, slap an empty ticket bag on the car and take photo's to look like

it's been ticketed, remove the bag and note the tax details etc before

walking away. The driver returns and assumes he's okay because he was only gone a

few minutes and there's no ticket. About 10 minutes later somewhere out of sight, the PA prints out the ticket

and bins it !!! Because the camera time

is 10 mins fast it coincides with the PDA time and ticket - if the driver

appeals, the photos are there which show the ticket on the car."


Wait for the Notice of Owner and we can take it from here.

The corrupt parking warden may have made a mistake in the issuing of the ticket

cupcake_girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks Dubluke and DJKilla Queen.

>

> Yes I was over the white line so technicially a

> violation. Over zealous is an understatement, and

> I'm annoyed they snuck the envelope on the far

> side without speaking to us as it was clear what

> we were doing. >

> I will definitely ask them for the photographic

> evidence of the notice and not just the envelope.

> I've sent the letter off (their on-line appeals

> system is down...!) and will let you all know how

> it goes.



They are private contractors,and their only concern is profit.

You only have to look at this

footage

to realise they are not exactly people friendly.

dubluke Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to enforce the fine they must have photographic

> evidence of the parking ticket (the actual ticket

> not just the sleeve) placed somewhere on your

> windscreen or vehicle. Ask them to provide this

> evidence to you, if they cannot then they have no

> proof there was ever a ticket in there and you

> shoudl be able to get off it.


They don't need photographic evidence to enforce a parking a fine.

Their contemporaneous pocketbook notes regarding the issuing of PCNs

is sufficient.It obviously helps upon further appeal.

  • 3 weeks later...

alas, they have rejected my appeal and apparently they don't need photographic evidence of the actual ticket, rather the photo of the van committing the parking violation with the pocket (albeit empty!) is sufficient. the rejection included an explanation to say that i was creating a hazard for pedestrians - if so, surely i should have been issued the "ticket" in person and have been asked to move. i'm not disputing the parking violation, but would rather southwark acknowledge that it was nothing to do with safety / enhancing community life and everything to do with raising a few bob. hats off to the chap in the you-tube clip.


yours sixty quid down

I think the council are very unfair with tickets, I parked at the Elephant & Castle, just outside the mini cab place near the Bridge. Granted there were double yellow lines, but I went in the road turned around, pulled up by the hoarding, where they are demolishing a block of flats. I was stationary for approx 15 secs, to enable my daughter to climb in. I never left my car or switched the engine off and it was past 8pm at night, and empty. I had to pay the fine as apparently it is a no loading area, and my daughter getting in the car constituted loading !

cupcake_girl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alas, they have rejected my appeal and apparently

> they don't need photographic evidence of the

> actual ticket, rather the photo of the van

> committing the parking violation with the pocket

> (albeit empty!) is sufficient. the rejection

> included an explanation to say that i was creating

> a hazard for pedestrians - if so, surely i should

> have been issued the "ticket" in person and have

> been asked to move. i'm not disputing the parking

> violation, but would rather southwark acknowledge

> that it was nothing to do with safety / enhancing

> community life and everything to do with raising a

> few bob. hats off to the chap in the you-tube

> clip.

>

> yours sixty quid down



What was the offence code?

MOTORISTS When stopped by the police for speeding or driving dangerously, always indignantly point out that they could spend their time arresting 'proper' criminals. I haven't tried it myself, but I'm sure they'd see your point and let you off with a warning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...