Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can you not see why someone receiving such a letter might feel they were being asked to give something back for their treatment? Is that conmpletely lost on you? I think it's a valid point.


Secondly someone has targetted paitents only with this mail shot.....when a patient goes to kings for treatment they do not automatically agree to let their address be used for direct mail shots.....which technically are classed as junk mail. Do uoi expect that a shop has a right to direct mail you every time you buy something from it? Again I think that is a valid point to make. Perhaps there needs to be a consent form in place for all patients...you know one of those little boxes that says you do not wish to receive mail other than that related to treatment.


Just because Kings is a hospital doesn't mean those using it shouldn't expect the same privacy afforded them by other companies in realtion to personal data (and an addrees IS personal data).

I am sorry but this thread is completely absurd and I can only wonder at the Director of Fundraising's patience in responding to people's so-called 'concerns'.


King's saves lives. It treats patients who are very ill. Many people on this forum will owe it a great deal. It does so on a limited budget and so it tries to raise a bit more money by asking for donations. Like every other charity in the UK. Unlike many charities, it does not ambush people on the street. Unlike BT, it doesn't phone me up at inconvenient hours to suggest I'd save money by changing my internet provider. Every extra bit of money Kings raises means it can do a better job for its patients - that's you! If some of the people on this thread can't see that then maybe they should opt out of using King's and exercise their choice to go private.


Sorry to be so impatient but I am fed up with the NHS being expected to aspire to ridiculous standards which aren't expected of anyone else just because they're funded by taxes. I'm not suggesting King's should be immune to criticism, but please try and put in perspective what you are complaining about (receiving a letter) with the job they do (I'll say it

again - they save people's lives).


(For the avoidance of doubt this isn't directed specifically at OP whose concerns I think are unfounded but not expressed unreasonably - but general tone of debate since)

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just because Kings is a hospital doesn't mean

> those using it shouldn't expect the same privacy

> afforded them by other companies in realtion to

> personal data (and an addrees IS personal data).



but they're saying that they've consulted with the ICO and taken steps to comply


i'm with Hug, timster and the others who can't get the moaning - how bad can receiving a letter from a charity be? (even if it were to ask for a donation, which i understand it doesn't)


and as for those suggesting that people may not seek hospital care in case they get sent a letter from a reputable charity afterwards - do you really believe that?


guess you can't please all the people all of the time even when you're trying to do something positive

Dear Jane Ferguson,


I must admit that I am reading this at the end of the day, am I understanding this correctly? Are you saying that you have been given the names and addresses of all patients who have attended Kings within the last three months?


?All fundraisers target their marketing at people most likely to support their cause - for example someone who goes to a music concert would be a more likely support the arts, somebody who buys pet food is more likely to support animal welfare.?


That quote makes my hair stand on end. Let me point out to you (just in case you don't watch Holby City)that people do not necessarily suffer ill health by choice. They may not chose to attend outpatients for a jolly, instead of going to the opera or because they like doctors. The consequences of a clinic appointment are not necessarily ?feel good?.


Have you considered the possibility that you will be contacting some people who may wish to conceal their appointment from those they live with?


How can you be sure that your contact will not cause unnecessary questions and alarm in some homes where, for example, a teenager has sought treatment for an STI and hasn?t told her family, or a battered wife who had a termination because she couldn?t face another pregnancy?


It is my experience that many of the patients who attend a hospital would indeed be termed "vulnerable."


As someone who has had a long professional association with Kings, I am horrified by this blanket approach you have taken to fundraising. I pay tax to finance the health service. I do not welcome anyone having access to my name and address or contacting me in my home, simply because I attended outpatients.


You sound jolly pleased with the response you have had so far. Give a thought for those who may not have contacted you to offer you cash, who could be suffering the consequences of your actions.


Best wishes

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So the hospital's Chief Executive has used the

> patients address records, in the hope of

> benefitting the charity?



I disassociate myself from some more strongly worded posts on this thread, but I would still like to think that patient address records were not being used for charitable requests, either directly by the charity (not the case) or indirectly via the Chief Exec (seems to be the case).


This is because I have been fortunate enough to have benefitted greatly from the professionalism of King's over recent years.


However, I think often people who have been treated by the NHS are potentially vulnerable to requests for funds.


If the letters are indeed being sent to former patients then some who receive the letters may read an implication between the lines: "You have received good treatment form your local hospital, would you like now to pay a bit more for that treatment and the treatment of others"


And therefore you may feel a little guilty, in not giving.


However - those receiving NHS treatment may in general be the more vulnerable in society - because those who have suffered life threatening conditions are often feeling very weak and insecure.



Those who support the sending of these letters should ask themselves whether this practice was well thought through. But whilst I agree with many that it was well intentioned, it was poorly targeted.



DM, this is arrant nonsense - you know full well that ANY institution you have interacted with has access to your name and address. Why is this even remotely controversial? Do you view any letter from companies as invading your privacy "in your own home"?


You have a real bee in your bonnet about the fact that this is undertaken by and as someone who understands how to raise money - why does the fact that they could be selling butter or the fact that people don't choose to be ill relevant? I know the answer will be something to do with understanding patient's etc but there is a bigger picture


Why would anyone receiving a letter from Kings asking for money reveal anything about an appointment? It's a letter from an institution in need of money, asking for money. Not remotely suspicious


There are many many people who aren't outpatients who could be considered vulnerable as well


What do we do about appeals for the Pakistan floods? Stop them going out on TV in case vulnerable people are watching and feel compelled to give money?


So, ok, some people object to this method of raising money. I'm guessing you aren't arguing with the need for that money? In which case how would YOU choose to raise the money, if you were in charge at Kings?

>All fundraisers target their marketing at people most likely to support their cause - for example someone who goes to a music >concert would be a more likely support the arts, somebody who buys pet food is more likely to support animal welfare. Patients >who have had a positive experience in hospital are more likely to be interested in how that hospital's charity has made a >difference to their care, and possibly in supporting it financially.


>Let me put your mind absolutely at rest. We are a department within the hospital, but we will never have access to any patient >data. Every hospital has a DPA Officer and Caldicott Guardian to ensure that patient data is not used inappropriately.


I do not think people is nessecary aginst giving money to Kings but they have 2 questions:


1. How did Kings get the name and address if not from patient records?

2. Why were some but not all inpatients tageted?

i think you are missing the point mycroft.


Kings should not be using patient databases for non medical purposes.


That is as far as it goes really.


My personal view on fundraising is that the NHS will never have all the money it wants. Thats a different debate.

It just never occurs to me to think that my address is the same as my ?medical records?


I pretty much figure that any time I give my address to anyone, it?s going to get used. I?d be annoyed if I was getting letters from l?Oreal saying ?following your recent attendance at Kings?. It has come to our attention that your hair is in need of??


But for a Kings representative to send a letter to me? I just don?t see that as my ?medical? records being used


yes to the first point, not so sure about the second. Surely if we were having that other debate we would be talking about many of the same points we are here?

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree completely with Sean on this.

>

> Look, we live in an age where you can go on the

> internet, and get the home address of anyone you

> want. Who @#$%& cares?


Its whether its the correct policy, or not, to approach patients for cash donations.

Didn?t Admin approach everyone on here a while back when the server needed upgrading or something and suggest that, should anyone care to, use the Donate link on the site


I don?t recall any hullabaloo. I don?t recall anyone saying the privacy of their inbox was invaded! I don?t recall anyone accusing admin of treating us like ?customers?. I don?t recall anyone saying ?what??? I pay my broadband, my phone line and my PC and now you want me to pay for the forum as well!!!!?


I don?t recall stories of vulnerable old people such as [snip!] who, stuck in their homes with only the forum as a lifeline to the local community being guilt-tripped into handing over money they don?t have


It?s not an ideal situation that a hospital has to hold out a bowl for extra cash, but I fail to see how it could be innapropriate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...