Jump to content

Gay lib outside the charity shop (contains rudeness)


Recommended Posts

Ooooh - you are so right Bob - Russian Goggles seemed absolutely bewildering - can you imgaine trying to mug someone using that method? Imagine the evidence you'd have to give in court!


One day I think I am going to start a thread asking people to divulge how often they check this forum and where they do it. I think the stats could be shocking... no wonder UK productivity is down this year!

Seagulling is when you have a wank, collect the fluid in your hand and then run out into the playground to slap it into the face of some poor unfortunate fellow pupil while yelling "Seagull!!".


Not something I've ever done, but then I'm 36!



Charlie

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rudeness and eye-opening colourful colloquialisms.

> Though next time I wander past a playground I may

> keep my eyes shut...just to be safe!!


And your mouth. Better safe than sorry.

this thread has sparked a debate in my office about the subject of seagulling, which has found itself launched into a heated conversation about tea-bagging......(I'm in an office with 3 male I.T.technicians!)

perfect friday afternoon conversations.....:-S

Isn't it amazing how a thread mutates. I was just about to reply to BB's latest post when I realised it would start to make this a thread about films


Personally I like the way this happens - usually - but I can see how frustrating it is for some people


I would take the conversation to the Film Theatre thread - but amazingly there isn't one (is there?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...