Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that one day insects wuill inherit the earth. I have just been watching a David Attenborough documentary about African ants. These ants are farmers. They take grass back to their mounds and a special fungus is grown on it. It's the only place in the world that this fungus grows and these ants eat it. However, it produces dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built their mounds to have air conditioning so that harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing. Individually the ants have no intelligence, but collectively they are like cells in a massive brain.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

However, it produces

> dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built

> their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> collectively they are like cells in a massive

> brain.


Blimey - so ants are contributing to global warming?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> waynetta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> However, it produces

> > dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have

> built

> > their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> > harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> > Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> > collectively they are like cells in a massive

> > brain.

>

> Blimey - so ants are contributing to global

> warming?


Noooooo LM they aren't.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't carb. mon a GH gas?


Y-es. It is also a naturally occuring substance and has been around for a very long time.


*thinks probably as long as LM's guests have been wondering where she is*

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I often find it helps to break down these

> questions into smaller fragments - in this case

> before deciding what makes us 'human', you have to

> decide what 'human' is.

>

> This isn't as simple as it sounds. It's difficult

> to define what 'human' is in any consistent way.

> For example we could argue that humans have two

> arms and two legs, but we're all agreed that

> losing a limb in an accident doesn't make us less

> than human.

>

> Likewise we're familiar with anatomically perfect

> people being described as 'inhuman', so apparently

> defining a 'human' must somehow revolve around a

> set of values - not a physical form.

>

> We're into the realm of many great philosophers

> here, particularly concerning whether these values

> can be defined or expressed in particular actions,

> or whether the thoughts themselves are what

> defines our humanity.

>

> In other words, if we think nice thoughts but are

> unable to put them into action then are we still

> nice? More pointedly if we think nasty thoughts

> but do good deeds are we then good?

>

> For most people, a person thinking nasty thoughts

> but doing good deeds would be described in

> unpleasant terms - for example 'two faced'.

>

> So possibly we could conclude the generally

> accepted definition of 'human' lies within

> thoughts and beliefs, not in actions or

> appearances.

>

> Those thoughts and beliefs considered most

> 'humane' are generally altruistic ones - a process

> which requires abstract reasoning, an

> understanding of cause and effect, and

> collaboration for the greater good.

>

> In other words what makes us human is the ability

> to do things such as watching the wildlife,

> drawing insights and parallels, and using these to

> inform our decisions about the future on both a

> moral plane and a physical one.


Blimey Mr. H - that post (almost) sobered me up...beautiful.

LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse atmosphere and always has been. We breath in Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal balance of life on the planet and in that regard we are mostly responsible.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but so is C02...it's still causing probs

> though as it re-radiates the sun's heat and

> contributes to global warming.

> *thinks...not bad for half a frog*


*thinks...then decides against it*


> *disappears back to guests/another top up of

> cider*


*wonders how many moles of CO2 are in LM's cider* :)-D

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse

> atmosphere and always has been. We breath in

> Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and

> release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over

> prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal

> balance of life on the planet and in that regard

> we are mostly responsible.


No it hasn't. Earth's atmosphere has changed throughout the history of the planet. For example, there was much less oxygen in the atmosphere 2400 million years ago. Oh and there are far less rare gases in the atmosphere now than existed a very long time ago too.


PS. *warns moles to leave LM's cider alone*

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's true but in the modern lifespan of the

> planet it is a greenhouse atmoshpere and it's that

> greenhouse atmosphere that has given us the

> ecosystems we have.


I'd like to know what you consider to be the 'modern lifespan of the planet'. The trouble is.....this often varies from person to person. Makes it very difficult to accurately demonstrate scientific facts. So your earlier comment about the Earth's atmosphere having always being a greenhouse environment is completely inaccurate, to put it politely.


When do you think the 'greenhouse atmosphere that gave us the ecosystems we have' came into existence?


The planet used to have a reducing environment and then it became an oxidising environment.

No those greenhouse gasses are what have allowed the earth to have the range of temperatures necessary for life. Without them too cold, too much of them too hot. It's called the 'Goldilocks Principle' and is why we are the only planet on our solar system with life. The main gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide and they trap sufficent solar energy to create the right temperature ranges.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Some foxes are very tame. The foxes that live near the electricity sub-station thing on the corner of Calton and Woodwarde will happily walk up to you/passed you. They are some of the best looking foxes around so clearly being well-fed - glorious coats and bushy tails but interested in humans and keen to engage/be fed rather than being scared.
    • Let’s not all get scared of the foxes now. Most likely explanation is protecting its den or association with food. We have foxes, and cats and they are no bother to each other. The fox will leave when the cats are out.   
    • I remember seeing something a few years ago on TV about a fox that was actually biting through people's shopping / takeaway food bags.  It was situated in an alleyway.  Not in London.  Very interesting in how the  urban foxes brain development has  been affected by their surroundings.   Not an exact quote from Darwin.  It's the adaptable that survive / not the strongest or the most intelligent.   I would be worried if a fox came close me.   Because they might be after my fur babies and they carry a lot of nasties.   Although they look beautiful from a distance or on a 🎄 card.  
    • Driving down Lordship lane around 2.45pm today saw a v sick looking fox walking in and out of the crowd. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...