Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that one day insects wuill inherit the earth. I have just been watching a David Attenborough documentary about African ants. These ants are farmers. They take grass back to their mounds and a special fungus is grown on it. It's the only place in the world that this fungus grows and these ants eat it. However, it produces dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built their mounds to have air conditioning so that harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing. Individually the ants have no intelligence, but collectively they are like cells in a massive brain.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

However, it produces

> dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built

> their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> collectively they are like cells in a massive

> brain.


Blimey - so ants are contributing to global warming?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> waynetta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> However, it produces

> > dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have

> built

> > their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> > harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> > Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> > collectively they are like cells in a massive

> > brain.

>

> Blimey - so ants are contributing to global

> warming?


Noooooo LM they aren't.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't carb. mon a GH gas?


Y-es. It is also a naturally occuring substance and has been around for a very long time.


*thinks probably as long as LM's guests have been wondering where she is*

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I often find it helps to break down these

> questions into smaller fragments - in this case

> before deciding what makes us 'human', you have to

> decide what 'human' is.

>

> This isn't as simple as it sounds. It's difficult

> to define what 'human' is in any consistent way.

> For example we could argue that humans have two

> arms and two legs, but we're all agreed that

> losing a limb in an accident doesn't make us less

> than human.

>

> Likewise we're familiar with anatomically perfect

> people being described as 'inhuman', so apparently

> defining a 'human' must somehow revolve around a

> set of values - not a physical form.

>

> We're into the realm of many great philosophers

> here, particularly concerning whether these values

> can be defined or expressed in particular actions,

> or whether the thoughts themselves are what

> defines our humanity.

>

> In other words, if we think nice thoughts but are

> unable to put them into action then are we still

> nice? More pointedly if we think nasty thoughts

> but do good deeds are we then good?

>

> For most people, a person thinking nasty thoughts

> but doing good deeds would be described in

> unpleasant terms - for example 'two faced'.

>

> So possibly we could conclude the generally

> accepted definition of 'human' lies within

> thoughts and beliefs, not in actions or

> appearances.

>

> Those thoughts and beliefs considered most

> 'humane' are generally altruistic ones - a process

> which requires abstract reasoning, an

> understanding of cause and effect, and

> collaboration for the greater good.

>

> In other words what makes us human is the ability

> to do things such as watching the wildlife,

> drawing insights and parallels, and using these to

> inform our decisions about the future on both a

> moral plane and a physical one.


Blimey Mr. H - that post (almost) sobered me up...beautiful.

LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse atmosphere and always has been. We breath in Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal balance of life on the planet and in that regard we are mostly responsible.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but so is C02...it's still causing probs

> though as it re-radiates the sun's heat and

> contributes to global warming.

> *thinks...not bad for half a frog*


*thinks...then decides against it*


> *disappears back to guests/another top up of

> cider*


*wonders how many moles of CO2 are in LM's cider* :)-D

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse

> atmosphere and always has been. We breath in

> Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and

> release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over

> prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal

> balance of life on the planet and in that regard

> we are mostly responsible.


No it hasn't. Earth's atmosphere has changed throughout the history of the planet. For example, there was much less oxygen in the atmosphere 2400 million years ago. Oh and there are far less rare gases in the atmosphere now than existed a very long time ago too.


PS. *warns moles to leave LM's cider alone*

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's true but in the modern lifespan of the

> planet it is a greenhouse atmoshpere and it's that

> greenhouse atmosphere that has given us the

> ecosystems we have.


I'd like to know what you consider to be the 'modern lifespan of the planet'. The trouble is.....this often varies from person to person. Makes it very difficult to accurately demonstrate scientific facts. So your earlier comment about the Earth's atmosphere having always being a greenhouse environment is completely inaccurate, to put it politely.


When do you think the 'greenhouse atmosphere that gave us the ecosystems we have' came into existence?


The planet used to have a reducing environment and then it became an oxidising environment.

No those greenhouse gasses are what have allowed the earth to have the range of temperatures necessary for life. Without them too cold, too much of them too hot. It's called the 'Goldilocks Principle' and is why we are the only planet on our solar system with life. The main gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide and they trap sufficent solar energy to create the right temperature ranges.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 info@jkec.net Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • The contact email for the Major Works Team: majorworks@southwark.gov.uk
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...