Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think that one day insects wuill inherit the earth. I have just been watching a David Attenborough documentary about African ants. These ants are farmers. They take grass back to their mounds and a special fungus is grown on it. It's the only place in the world that this fungus grows and these ants eat it. However, it produces dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built their mounds to have air conditioning so that harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing. Individually the ants have no intelligence, but collectively they are like cells in a massive brain.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

However, it produces

> dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have built

> their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> collectively they are like cells in a massive

> brain.


Blimey - so ants are contributing to global warming?

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> waynetta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> However, it produces

> > dangerous carbon monoxide so the ants have

> built

> > their mounds to have air conditioning so that

> > harmful fumes are got rid of. It's amazing.

> > Individually the ants have no intelligence, but

> > collectively they are like cells in a massive

> > brain.

>

> Blimey - so ants are contributing to global

> warming?


Noooooo LM they aren't.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Isn't carb. mon a GH gas?


Y-es. It is also a naturally occuring substance and has been around for a very long time.


*thinks probably as long as LM's guests have been wondering where she is*

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I often find it helps to break down these

> questions into smaller fragments - in this case

> before deciding what makes us 'human', you have to

> decide what 'human' is.

>

> This isn't as simple as it sounds. It's difficult

> to define what 'human' is in any consistent way.

> For example we could argue that humans have two

> arms and two legs, but we're all agreed that

> losing a limb in an accident doesn't make us less

> than human.

>

> Likewise we're familiar with anatomically perfect

> people being described as 'inhuman', so apparently

> defining a 'human' must somehow revolve around a

> set of values - not a physical form.

>

> We're into the realm of many great philosophers

> here, particularly concerning whether these values

> can be defined or expressed in particular actions,

> or whether the thoughts themselves are what

> defines our humanity.

>

> In other words, if we think nice thoughts but are

> unable to put them into action then are we still

> nice? More pointedly if we think nasty thoughts

> but do good deeds are we then good?

>

> For most people, a person thinking nasty thoughts

> but doing good deeds would be described in

> unpleasant terms - for example 'two faced'.

>

> So possibly we could conclude the generally

> accepted definition of 'human' lies within

> thoughts and beliefs, not in actions or

> appearances.

>

> Those thoughts and beliefs considered most

> 'humane' are generally altruistic ones - a process

> which requires abstract reasoning, an

> understanding of cause and effect, and

> collaboration for the greater good.

>

> In other words what makes us human is the ability

> to do things such as watching the wildlife,

> drawing insights and parallels, and using these to

> inform our decisions about the future on both a

> moral plane and a physical one.


Blimey Mr. H - that post (almost) sobered me up...beautiful.

LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse atmosphere and always has been. We breath in Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal balance of life on the planet and in that regard we are mostly responsible.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but so is C02...it's still causing probs

> though as it re-radiates the sun's heat and

> contributes to global warming.

> *thinks...not bad for half a frog*


*thinks...then decides against it*


> *disappears back to guests/another top up of

> cider*


*wonders how many moles of CO2 are in LM's cider* :)-D

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM the earth's atmosphere is a greenhouse

> atmosphere and always has been. We breath in

> Oxygen and breathe out CO2, plants abosorb it and

> release oxygen and so on. The issue is the over

> prduction of CO2 above and beyond the normal

> balance of life on the planet and in that regard

> we are mostly responsible.


No it hasn't. Earth's atmosphere has changed throughout the history of the planet. For example, there was much less oxygen in the atmosphere 2400 million years ago. Oh and there are far less rare gases in the atmosphere now than existed a very long time ago too.


PS. *warns moles to leave LM's cider alone*

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's true but in the modern lifespan of the

> planet it is a greenhouse atmoshpere and it's that

> greenhouse atmosphere that has given us the

> ecosystems we have.


I'd like to know what you consider to be the 'modern lifespan of the planet'. The trouble is.....this often varies from person to person. Makes it very difficult to accurately demonstrate scientific facts. So your earlier comment about the Earth's atmosphere having always being a greenhouse environment is completely inaccurate, to put it politely.


When do you think the 'greenhouse atmosphere that gave us the ecosystems we have' came into existence?


The planet used to have a reducing environment and then it became an oxidising environment.

No those greenhouse gasses are what have allowed the earth to have the range of temperatures necessary for life. Without them too cold, too much of them too hot. It's called the 'Goldilocks Principle' and is why we are the only planet on our solar system with life. The main gases are water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide and they trap sufficent solar energy to create the right temperature ranges.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My bird app just picked up swifts before I heard or saw them!  
    • I highly recommend Temi as a very skilled and reliable painter / decorator based in the East Dulwich & SE London area. She has completed many jobs for us over the past 10 years at our property on Overhill Road SE22 and also on Harlescott Road SE15, and we have always been thoroughly impressed with her work. We often leave her with keys and leave her to work her magic, fully confident that she's 100% trustworthy and will always do a fantastic job. If you're looking for a trustworthy local decorator who delivers exceptional work Temi is a great person to call. I'm not affiliated with her or her business in any way and actually found her through a recommendation on the ED forum over 10 years ago, i just like to recommend really good tradespeople who deserve a thank you. Temi - 07784 289024  
    • Wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Leon. Very reasonably priced and called out on the same day I contacted him! 
    • ''He caused chaos  in this country with his put down of everything British and his many dismal words about the effects of Brexit on this country.'' What utter tosh. Carney had to mitigate the effects of Brexit caused by plastic patriots like Farage. For example, immediately after the 2016 Brexit vote the BoE had to intervene fiscally by dropping interest rates and increasing QE in order to prevent the economy from taking a big hit.  They were unable to prevent the £ from crashing at the time, and it has since been worked out that the effect of that alone caused a circa £900/year hit to each UK household, which equates to the UK @ £450m/week.   There's reams of data out there that shows the economic damage Brexit has caused to the UK. Here's one looking at business investment, admittedly not very sexy but kinda important if you want to achieve economic growth. It's clear to see that prior to 2016 we had reached parity with some of our main rivals, but since then we've flatlined. All that Brexit has achieved is to win the race to the bottom. There's a reason why Farage never brought up Brexit at the last election, he knows himself it hasn't delivered on any of the promises, quite the reverse in fact.  Labour, stupidly, by saying they can make Brexit work have in effect given Farage a Get Out of Jail Free card...    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...