Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.


And it is always a lot more convenient for the bumming.

My point was why on earth there should be anything wrong with sharing twin rooms.


I have always thought William Hague was a good guy - It would be a great shame if he had an affair of any type esp since he and his wife have been trying unsuccessfully for a baby.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> who cares who William Hague, his staff or anybody

> else f*cks

> 'ooh he's gay' / 'ooh he's straight'

-----------------------------------------------------


Yes who cares ( other than the woman he's married to ) really


OKAY an analysis of his attire


Black "wrap" sunnies, often sported by "rugger buggers " ( you know "rugger" lots of butch men bashing into each other, then sharing a bath )


Or glasses worn on beach by "voyeurs" as the wrap around shape hides the swiveling eye technique


Next we have the hat: one size to small, brown with "sphincter" logo



I mean, it's not looking good as individual pieces or as a combo, is it ?



W**F

If I was Hague, I'd be telling everyone I was a homosexual.


The alternative - someone who actively chooses sharing a twin room over having his own comfy double - makes him a complete weirdo. One assumes some of the ?40Bn defence spend could have stretched to a double - for the foreign secretary.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.

>

> Is there more to this story....


not sure about chats and late Whiskeys, more like 'come upstairs I'd like 2 liqueurs'


Anyway don't the England team still share rooms? it'd not like anyone is accusing any of them being gay is it? Oh hold on.


I guess at the end of the day it's none of our business unless they get up to something that can lead to blackmail etc

Usually on weekends away for rugby etc, as if you have not had enough to drink already, someone always seems to have a hip flask....


Personally I think it is the norm for golf trips/rugby etc. I guess it is sometimes a cost issue.


What is obviously different here is that Hague was on work rather than social. In which case it may seem a bit odd.

Except that you're all missing the point.


No-one cares (or at least they shouldn't) whether Hague is gay or not. Except for Ffion, maybe. What is a problem is that the Foreign Secretary has hired someone palpably unqualified for the job as a Special Adviser. Now if he did this as an act of nepotism because the boy gave good head then it's a clear breach of both parliamentary rules and morality.


Hague can sleep with animal, mineral or vegetable, I don't care as long as he's good at his job. But he's shown a stunning lack of judgement in this appointment and the idea that a prominent member of the opposition, a married millionaire, would "share" a room with his aide merely reinforces this lack of judgement. If his aide was female everyone would be on him like a flash - why not now?


Number 10 have quelled the flames by making Hague issue a statement, and his personal bereavements are undoubtably tragic, but it doesn't excuse hiring a 25 year old, who's experience amounts to being a driver, as a political adviser on foreign relations.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The millionaire thing is a red herring, he won't

> be using his own money to pay for hotels when

> attending conferences, etc.


I disagree. Even if the coalition forced the Foreign Secretary to share a room on trips if I could afford it I would upgrade myself to a single.


No-one apart from possible his wife care who he f**** but if he has voted anti-gay before it is an issue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...