Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.


And it is always a lot more convenient for the bumming.

My point was why on earth there should be anything wrong with sharing twin rooms.


I have always thought William Hague was a good guy - It would be a great shame if he had an affair of any type esp since he and his wife have been trying unsuccessfully for a baby.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> who cares who William Hague, his staff or anybody

> else f*cks

> 'ooh he's gay' / 'ooh he's straight'

-----------------------------------------------------


Yes who cares ( other than the woman he's married to ) really


OKAY an analysis of his attire


Black "wrap" sunnies, often sported by "rugger buggers " ( you know "rugger" lots of butch men bashing into each other, then sharing a bath )


Or glasses worn on beach by "voyeurs" as the wrap around shape hides the swiveling eye technique


Next we have the hat: one size to small, brown with "sphincter" logo



I mean, it's not looking good as individual pieces or as a combo, is it ?



W**F

If I was Hague, I'd be telling everyone I was a homosexual.


The alternative - someone who actively chooses sharing a twin room over having his own comfy double - makes him a complete weirdo. One assumes some of the ?40Bn defence spend could have stretched to a double - for the foreign secretary.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.

>

> Is there more to this story....


not sure about chats and late Whiskeys, more like 'come upstairs I'd like 2 liqueurs'


Anyway don't the England team still share rooms? it'd not like anyone is accusing any of them being gay is it? Oh hold on.


I guess at the end of the day it's none of our business unless they get up to something that can lead to blackmail etc

Usually on weekends away for rugby etc, as if you have not had enough to drink already, someone always seems to have a hip flask....


Personally I think it is the norm for golf trips/rugby etc. I guess it is sometimes a cost issue.


What is obviously different here is that Hague was on work rather than social. In which case it may seem a bit odd.

Except that you're all missing the point.


No-one cares (or at least they shouldn't) whether Hague is gay or not. Except for Ffion, maybe. What is a problem is that the Foreign Secretary has hired someone palpably unqualified for the job as a Special Adviser. Now if he did this as an act of nepotism because the boy gave good head then it's a clear breach of both parliamentary rules and morality.


Hague can sleep with animal, mineral or vegetable, I don't care as long as he's good at his job. But he's shown a stunning lack of judgement in this appointment and the idea that a prominent member of the opposition, a married millionaire, would "share" a room with his aide merely reinforces this lack of judgement. If his aide was female everyone would be on him like a flash - why not now?


Number 10 have quelled the flames by making Hague issue a statement, and his personal bereavements are undoubtably tragic, but it doesn't excuse hiring a 25 year old, who's experience amounts to being a driver, as a political adviser on foreign relations.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The millionaire thing is a red herring, he won't

> be using his own money to pay for hotels when

> attending conferences, etc.


I disagree. Even if the coalition forced the Foreign Secretary to share a room on trips if I could afford it I would upgrade myself to a single.


No-one apart from possible his wife care who he f**** but if he has voted anti-gay before it is an issue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No I won't. This has nothing to do with Ryedale and everything to do with the way people approach news. 
    • I'm getting dozens of fliers a year from all the estate agents.  I'm not selling, thinking of selling or renting out. The one from John D Woods really got my goat as it is plastic coated so can't even be recycled.  I've emailed them.  They must be making so much money to to these mass mail outs.  I couldn't find the old thread about things that put you into an irrational rage (although this rage is not irrational) I have a nice time too watching GB win their first medal at the Winter Olympics - that is an understatement! I'll burn it, sod the tiny impact on air quality.
    • @PenguinYou will have to explain this to me bearing in mind your and others outrage at a possible new scheme on Ryedale, and the use by many on this forum of Southwark News to support their reaction. I don't know what precautionary mindset means.  The precautionary principle is that we need to act now for example in tackling climate change rather than wait twenty years for conclusive evidence (that was the situation in 2006 when Stern published his report) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
    • Yes, and their sister (?) company Inigo has some interesting Not Modern properties as well! Interesting as in marvelling at people's very varied  tastes 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...