Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.


And it is always a lot more convenient for the bumming.

My point was why on earth there should be anything wrong with sharing twin rooms.


I have always thought William Hague was a good guy - It would be a great shame if he had an affair of any type esp since he and his wife have been trying unsuccessfully for a baby.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> who cares who William Hague, his staff or anybody

> else f*cks

> 'ooh he's gay' / 'ooh he's straight'

-----------------------------------------------------


Yes who cares ( other than the woman he's married to ) really


OKAY an analysis of his attire


Black "wrap" sunnies, often sported by "rugger buggers " ( you know "rugger" lots of butch men bashing into each other, then sharing a bath )


Or glasses worn on beach by "voyeurs" as the wrap around shape hides the swiveling eye technique


Next we have the hat: one size to small, brown with "sphincter" logo



I mean, it's not looking good as individual pieces or as a combo, is it ?



W**F

If I was Hague, I'd be telling everyone I was a homosexual.


The alternative - someone who actively chooses sharing a twin room over having his own comfy double - makes him a complete weirdo. One assumes some of the ?40Bn defence spend could have stretched to a double - for the foreign secretary.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently its enough to make you resign.

>

> Surely until recently, on all boys weekends away,

> twin rooms were compulsory. They were a lot

> cheaper than single rooms and you could chat and

> have a late whiskey.

>

> Is there more to this story....


not sure about chats and late Whiskeys, more like 'come upstairs I'd like 2 liqueurs'


Anyway don't the England team still share rooms? it'd not like anyone is accusing any of them being gay is it? Oh hold on.


I guess at the end of the day it's none of our business unless they get up to something that can lead to blackmail etc

Usually on weekends away for rugby etc, as if you have not had enough to drink already, someone always seems to have a hip flask....


Personally I think it is the norm for golf trips/rugby etc. I guess it is sometimes a cost issue.


What is obviously different here is that Hague was on work rather than social. In which case it may seem a bit odd.

Except that you're all missing the point.


No-one cares (or at least they shouldn't) whether Hague is gay or not. Except for Ffion, maybe. What is a problem is that the Foreign Secretary has hired someone palpably unqualified for the job as a Special Adviser. Now if he did this as an act of nepotism because the boy gave good head then it's a clear breach of both parliamentary rules and morality.


Hague can sleep with animal, mineral or vegetable, I don't care as long as he's good at his job. But he's shown a stunning lack of judgement in this appointment and the idea that a prominent member of the opposition, a married millionaire, would "share" a room with his aide merely reinforces this lack of judgement. If his aide was female everyone would be on him like a flash - why not now?


Number 10 have quelled the flames by making Hague issue a statement, and his personal bereavements are undoubtably tragic, but it doesn't excuse hiring a 25 year old, who's experience amounts to being a driver, as a political adviser on foreign relations.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The millionaire thing is a red herring, he won't

> be using his own money to pay for hotels when

> attending conferences, etc.


I disagree. Even if the coalition forced the Foreign Secretary to share a room on trips if I could afford it I would upgrade myself to a single.


No-one apart from possible his wife care who he f**** but if he has voted anti-gay before it is an issue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...