Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone watch it?


I watched it properly yesterday for the first time. To my mind it appeared to have it priorities right in terms of what should be considered important. For example, the main news item was that of those killed in land-slides across Guatemala, whereas items such as match-fixing in cricket were much further down the news agenda. The channel also broadcast some interesting (though heartbreaking) stories - the type we would rarely get to see properly covered on BBC News (let alone Sky) - e.g. the plight of some 150,000 refugees from Myanmar basically living in rubbish dumps across the border in Thailand.


For me, it made a refreshing change.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/13114-the-al-jazeera-news-channel/
Share on other sites

I used to watch this in Africa as there was no BBC World where I was and you may as well watch Ceebeeies above CNN for facts and educational commentary.

Whilst not laugh a minute... I always thought it had articles that you wouldnt see elsewhere and the coverage of the storming of the boat by Israeli troops in Gaza was excellent.

I dont think any news channel is (Fox is my favorite for opinions on TV which havent been heard since the 1950s... I am still convinced they will announce that it is actually all a big joke and the right wing nutters interviewed are actually actors) but AJ shows a different viewpoint and highlights global issues that arent considered reportable say in the UK or US.

More balanced doesn't equal impartial and I have seen some very biased reporting from AJ especially on Isreal/ Arab issues.....


I agree no major news channels are impartial, CNN, Fox, even the BBC.......but please let's not kid ourselves that AJ is somehow different. The BBC do also cover very serious issues in an excellent way.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but it's not the most impartial of channels

> though is it.


Perhaps you haven't watched Glenn Beck, strapline "the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment". If so, you will not comprehend exactly what partiality is. By comparison AJ is very grounded, very serious, and employs some incredibly professional journalists. It is a different perspective, but a perspective to be taken seriously. Unlike Fox etc.

I certainly wouldnt knock BBC news- its just different perspective - like I read the Guardian, Independent and when it was free used to read Times online. I think it healthy to get a range of views and I suppose we are lucky we have that available to us through a variety of media. I wouldnt like to think I could only rely on one source of news, especially if it was emanating from the Murdoch empire

I thought Al Jazeera largely comprised ex-BBC people, or was at the time Bush decided to drop a bomb on them - no guarantee the dead were replaced by the same.


In this day and age, I don't think any of the news outfits are impartial so if Al Jazeera falls over at that hurdle, it simply joins the rest of its running mates - no better, no worse - though I've also thought of them as being more rounded in their coverage of the news. And one doesn't get the sense that American / UK news is somehow more newsworthy than similar news from other parts of the globe.


Gets my vote.

Will have to try Al-Jazeera, sounds mature.

Any news channel focussing on people being naughty while playing bat and ball in preference to broadcasting useful and meaningful news (some of which has been outlined above) means I need to look elsewhere.

If that also means there's no cheating footballers or 'who slept with who' stories I'm alomost sold !

I agree on the cricket thing......it's not like cheating in sport is a new thing.......


Having said that.....news coverage tends to reflect local interest and perhaps there is a case for saying that the BBC, Fox, CNN and so on reflect what their viewers will watch. Would any of those channels get the same ratings if they only covered more serious political and global news, in more in depth ways? And where channels rely on advertising or sponsorship, ratings are everything...even in news coverage.


A case in point would be looking at the coverage of the recent extremely serious flooding in Pakistan. It didn't get anything like the amount of coverage of many less intrusive disasters.


Whether we like it or not the UK has become a culture that prefers on the whole, titilating scandel over anything that requires serious thought around complex issues. Most people have the attention span of a flea for such things. The demise of documentary and the ratings for documentary in the UK is absolute proof of that. We are lazy and apathetic in comparison to other parts of the world.

Last week I berated Dulwich Library/Southwark Libraries for not having any way at all of identifying documentaries within their DVD holdings, whether via the online catalogue or in person. Sigh.


And on Pakistan, some lessons here for how not to manage land, anywhere in the world. Some coverage thankfully in the (Glasgow) Herald: http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/world-news/a-land-left-to-drown-by-the-timber-mafia-1.1051230

I'm also thinking of giving the Russian Channel a go. Does anyone watch that one?


As dita above has suggested, we are fortunate to have so many channels at our disposal. To be able to obtain different viewpoints and to watch broadcasts from alternative standpoints is exciting and enlightening (for me, anyway). Don't misunderstand, I like the BBC. However, I sometimes feel that the order in which they broadcast news items is a little skewed and it was very interesting to note how differently they prioritised their agenda to Al Jazeera. From now on I am definitely going to give channels other than the BBC a look-in in addition to viewing the BBC.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...