Jump to content

Another ill-thought out council plan....


Rockets

Recommended Posts

...the council have excelled themselves this time.


Next Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday Alleyn Park Road will be closed for resurfacing causing huge disruption to Kingsdale and Dulwich Prep schools. Both schools were informed of the plan last Friday and despite both lobbying the council for a more common-sense approach (delay it a few days as the schools will have broken up for Christmas) they are carrying on regardless. The length of Alleyn Park will be closed from the Gypsy Hill roundabout to the Alleyns Head pub so prepare yourself for traffic chaos at both ends during drop and pick-up.


The stupidity of our council amazes me sometimes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And sometimes parents drive because they are

> selfish and are poor at time management.



I'll agree that the road behavior of some parents when dropping off/picking up is pretty abhorrent. But assuming common decency and all road rules are followed, who is the arbiter of what constitutes a non-selfish reason to use public roads?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see the council and their contractors have seen sense and moved the works to a quieter time on the road network as it would affect not just the school runners but commuters too.


I did love the irony of a mum I spoke to once when she said that "she drives her kids to school because the amount of traffic on the road at school run time made it dangerous for them to walk"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived next door to a mum with 2 kids at the same primary as mine- 12 minutes walk away. She drove her kids to school (she did not work btw) but they were always late because of parking. In the end her eldest asked if he could walk with myself and my children because he was sick of being late for school every day. There were lollipop ladies across the busy roads as well....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew (slightly) someone who worked in the Bradenham block on the albany Road. It was very difficult to park around the block. In great indignation she told me that she had driven from her home (in East Dulwich) driven around the Bradenham area FOR HALF AN HOUR and then had to go home and catch a bus.


Not many buses on that route

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you judge a road improvement scheme to be ill-thought out if you are not privy to the decision-making? There are provably some very good and worthy reasons for planning the work into this week. Besides, if they were to wait until the schools closed, they would be starting work on 22nd December - which would have been ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@rahrahrah Depends. Ill health, poor mobility? Sure, no problem. Ten miles, fifty kilos of stuff, ditto.


But for routine, sub-five-mile hops around the city - which is what most of what's on the road is doing? How about people stop being blind to the consequences created - which for school run distances, if you're able-bodied, are just plain unnecessary.


Air quality - even if you don't believe the Clean Air Campaign's somewhat hyperbolic statistics about tens of thousands of deaths, it reduces quality of life for many times more.


Noise. (Which, thanks to its effects on blood pressure, may well be responsible for more premature deaths than bad air - and if nothing else, makes the otherwise-lovely outside tables at the cafes on a Village pretty rubbish experience much of the time).


Danger to others (#1 killer of under 25's in the developed world).


Kids losing much their freedom to walk, run, scoot and cycle around the place independently.


Wasting of road space, causing congestion for those trips/people for whom a car really is essential (and the concomitant increase in noise, emissions, etc.)


Healthy habits for life - in the context of the school run, what they learn in their early years sets patterns that are hard to change.


And all for what? Saving a few minutes here and there, keeping your hair dry, maybe avoiding breaking a sweat, not having to sit next to yoofs playing loud dubstep on the number 37. Worth it...?


We live in a crowded city, our choices have consequences for others. Why on earth would you tread more heavily than you have to? The moral dimension here should be glaringly obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Driving is not a crime,or some kind of moral

> deficiency. People need to stop being so

> judgemental.



Agree - large % of EDF confirmed as sanctimonious (and almost certainly hypocritical) prix

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have been useful to have warnings of this work on the S Circular.


This is my route to work & had no idea why traffic was so bad the last 2 days - properly

signposted warnings could have allowed me to make adjustments to my route rather than

add to the congestion 😡 (Driving is required for work before anyone suggests public transport - would rather be on bus/train looking at Socail Media!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, Does anyone have a compost bin they are looking to give away or sell please? Looking for one to place in communal garden. Thanks! Vina
    • Yes I fancied this but don't have the right bike or tweeds.  Maybe next year.
    • Ah the sending asylum seekers to Rwanda argument.  Well let's see how effective that is. I've made suggestions of what to do.
    • But you don't think the same protection should be afforded to those on the anti-LTN side...? Given the witch hunt some are be conducting to unearth which local residents are involved (see numerous examples on this forum), given the vandalism of the anti-LTN signs and interference with cars, labelling of anyone who opposes as some sort of petrol-head facist and given even Anna Goodman's tearing down of an anti-LTN poster you still think you only want anonimyity for those on one side of the argument? Does that not seem slightly hypocritical...it's why your first post on this issue entertained so many of us - it seemed ever so one-sided and summed up the challenges anyone who opposes the measures has to fight?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...