Jump to content

Recommended Posts

...the council have excelled themselves this time.


Next Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday Alleyn Park Road will be closed for resurfacing causing huge disruption to Kingsdale and Dulwich Prep schools. Both schools were informed of the plan last Friday and despite both lobbying the council for a more common-sense approach (delay it a few days as the schools will have broken up for Christmas) they are carrying on regardless. The length of Alleyn Park will be closed from the Gypsy Hill roundabout to the Alleyns Head pub so prepare yourself for traffic chaos at both ends during drop and pick-up.


The stupidity of our council amazes me sometimes....

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And sometimes parents drive because they are

> selfish and are poor at time management.



I'll agree that the road behavior of some parents when dropping off/picking up is pretty abhorrent. But assuming common decency and all road rules are followed, who is the arbiter of what constitutes a non-selfish reason to use public roads?

Glad to see the council and their contractors have seen sense and moved the works to a quieter time on the road network as it would affect not just the school runners but commuters too.


I did love the irony of a mum I spoke to once when she said that "she drives her kids to school because the amount of traffic on the road at school run time made it dangerous for them to walk"

I lived next door to a mum with 2 kids at the same primary as mine- 12 minutes walk away. She drove her kids to school (she did not work btw) but they were always late because of parking. In the end her eldest asked if he could walk with myself and my children because he was sick of being late for school every day. There were lollipop ladies across the busy roads as well....

I knew (slightly) someone who worked in the Bradenham block on the albany Road. It was very difficult to park around the block. In great indignation she told me that she had driven from her home (in East Dulwich) driven around the Bradenham area FOR HALF AN HOUR and then had to go home and catch a bus.


Not many buses on that route

Whatever peoples views of children walking or cycling to school the timing could have been wiser with minimal effort.

Long list of roads to be one and putting roads with school on the list solely during school holidays isn't beyond the council officers concerned.

How can you judge a road improvement scheme to be ill-thought out if you are not privy to the decision-making? There are provably some very good and worthy reasons for planning the work into this week. Besides, if they were to wait until the schools closed, they would be starting work on 22nd December - which would have been ridiculous.

@rahrahrah Depends. Ill health, poor mobility? Sure, no problem. Ten miles, fifty kilos of stuff, ditto.


But for routine, sub-five-mile hops around the city - which is what most of what's on the road is doing? How about people stop being blind to the consequences created - which for school run distances, if you're able-bodied, are just plain unnecessary.


Air quality - even if you don't believe the Clean Air Campaign's somewhat hyperbolic statistics about tens of thousands of deaths, it reduces quality of life for many times more.


Noise. (Which, thanks to its effects on blood pressure, may well be responsible for more premature deaths than bad air - and if nothing else, makes the otherwise-lovely outside tables at the cafes on a Village pretty rubbish experience much of the time).


Danger to others (#1 killer of under 25's in the developed world).


Kids losing much their freedom to walk, run, scoot and cycle around the place independently.


Wasting of road space, causing congestion for those trips/people for whom a car really is essential (and the concomitant increase in noise, emissions, etc.)


Healthy habits for life - in the context of the school run, what they learn in their early years sets patterns that are hard to change.


And all for what? Saving a few minutes here and there, keeping your hair dry, maybe avoiding breaking a sweat, not having to sit next to yoofs playing loud dubstep on the number 37. Worth it...?


We live in a crowded city, our choices have consequences for others. Why on earth would you tread more heavily than you have to? The moral dimension here should be glaringly obvious.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Driving is not a crime,or some kind of moral

> deficiency. People need to stop being so

> judgemental.



Agree - large % of EDF confirmed as sanctimonious (and almost certainly hypocritical) prix

Would have been useful to have warnings of this work on the S Circular.


This is my route to work & had no idea why traffic was so bad the last 2 days - properly

signposted warnings could have allowed me to make adjustments to my route rather than

add to the congestion 😡 (Driving is required for work before anyone suggests public transport - would rather be on bus/train looking at Socail Media!).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...