Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gamu was a terrorist?



Her mum was found guilty of being a benefits cheat and also an illegal immigrant and as a result her offspring are deemed to be the same, illegal immigrants that is.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If she is here illegally, yes.


Technically Not legally here.


She is here on her parents visa. That visa has expired.

The parents appeal to extend that visa failed.


The details are complex in that the application had errors with incorrect bank details.

There are also concerns about benifit claims.


Details Here

Ridgley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All I am saying if you are a terrorists, you

> should be deported as well as any illegal

> immigrants but that is not how the system works it

> seem to favour terrorist to stay in the country

> but an illegal immigrant does no have the same

> treatment why?


Ridgley, I say this whilst trying not to offend....but WTF are you on about?


Do you even know what you're talking about or just open your mouth and let stuff spew out? We jail terrorists. We try and deport those who shouldn't be here. The system isn't perfect and sometimes, I imagine, mistakes are made.


But unless you have evidence of mass waves of suicide bombers wandering the streets of Peckham, browsing the large selection of yams for sale, then try and post something that makes sense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Anyone know what the V7 local is turning into? Saw some guys painting it a teal colour last night which made me think it’s probably turning into another Truepennys haha - hopefully something more interesting
    • I agree with Sue here, but it is reasonable to raise a concern - there have been incidents of mass poisoning (from restaurants and cafes, supermarkets and food sellers such as butchers and fishmongers) where early warning (or a lack of it) has had a significant impact. But where this concern has been reasonably raised, but then discovered to be likely misplaced, it is a good thing to obfuscate the retailer identity. Of course, by removing the specificity, this might get later readers to worry that other ice-cream outlets locally were being implicated! Bit of a lose-lose situation really!
    • Yes, even  just the thread title will stick in people's minds, with the specific cafe mentioned. And they will see it every time they look at the list of threads in this section of the forum. It might be a good idea to change it to remove the cafe name and say something like "a local cafe"?
    • Our son really doesn't interact with others much and very rarely gets out, but when he does, an ice cream at the cafe is a favourite treat (even when it's freezing outside). Like yours, it's a single-person data point - in our case, no illness. Bugs can come from anything/anyone - other people are far more likely to be the unwitting carriers, in my view. Having gone there for years and years, never had a concern re the ice cream. And generally do worry about linking an establishment with illness/standards, even as a question as, even subconsciously, the association may stick in people's minds (and if they stop the ice cream, we'll be devastated!). 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...