Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

This perhaps should go in the 'things which cause rage thread'...but anyway...


As a resident of the badly affected Woodwarde/Beauval/Dovercourt area, myself and Mrs Cat do a pretty good job negotiating the dog sh!t minefield on a daily basis, particularly with baby in buggy and unruly toddler in tow. But this week, after successfully negotiating a 2 mile walk, we missed the steaming deposit which was left immediately outside our front gate, and managed to track it all the way up the front path, through the door, and into the hallway.....


Now, dog owners, I dont know if you've ever been on hands and knees cleaning up someone else's dog's sh!t from your front hallway floor, buggy wheels and front path before (also with a toddler hovering asking 'What are you doing daddy?', and 'can i touch the poo?')....but im pretty f#cking sure its a lot easier if you just pick up your damn dog's sh!t as soon as he does it.....

  • 4 weeks later...

Omg have you guys/girls heard yourselves. Have you really got nothing better to do.

I am the proud owner of two beautiful dogs I totally agree with the complaint of a dog messing on the pavement. It is nasty and foul.

So please get lives and leave this guy/girl alone.

"but im pretty f#cking sure its a lot easier if you just pick up your damn dog's sh!t as soon as he does it....."

totally agreed.

(as a dog owner)


That applies to parks too. I try to build-up my 'dog poo karma' by picking-up the odd dog poo that's sat there 'unclaimed' in the park. There are so many to choose from unfortunately.

One lady I gave her dog's poo in a doggy bag, having seen her big dog lay some serious cable right in front of her - but she was too busy 'talking dogs' with other owners to notice. I asked if she would kindly finish the job by taking the bag to a bin.

Of course, she denied it was her dog's.

To the original poster. Yes, very annoying! However I would probably have swept it into the kerb and not posted a pic of it. Maybe you could put a flyer up asking people to pick up after their dog? People are disgusting and if they pick it up they will probably end up on your car out of spite.


I have CCTV too! a) I have great pics of two mens tiny willys, arrive in shiny new porsche then receive themselves up my wall !!

b) lady in car getting shopping from her boot, using my car bonnet behind for a table to put all her shopping on.

c) man pulls up along side my car, opens car door swiftly and chips my wheel arch, then denies it when I go and confront him! d) Man manoeuvring, reverses (bang!) into my car, then says he couldn't see my car (its only a small range rover!) e) People selling drugs. f) pizza delivery scooter driving on pavement.......G) MAN STEALING CCTV CAMERA (image stored on hard-drive!)


ITS A BLESSING AND A CURSE! Ignore what you can. Do not get involved in anything unless it affects YOU or is a diabolical crime! You will go mad and waste hours of your life looking for culprits, and where crisp packets come from if you are not careful!! I KNOW !!


As for the dog has to go on the pavement because the front garden is paved over, makes NO SENSE. Was it supposed to go poop in someones garden?

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This perhaps should go in the 'things which cause

> rage thread'...but anyway...

>

> As a resident of the badly affected

> Woodwarde/Beauval/Dovercourt area, myself and Mrs

> Cat do a pretty good job negotiating the dog sh!t

> minefield on a daily basis, particularly with baby

> in buggy and unruly toddler in tow. But this week,

> after successfully negotiating a 2 mile walk, we

> missed the steaming deposit which was left

> immediately outside our front gate, and managed to

> track it all the way up the front path, through

> the door, and into the hallway.....

>

> Now, dog owners, I dont know if you've ever been

> on hands and knees cleaning up someone else's

> dog's sh!t from your front hallway floor, buggy

> wheels and front path before (also with a toddler

> hovering asking 'What are you doing daddy?', and

> 'can i touch the poo?')....but im pretty f#cking

> sure its a lot easier if you just pick up your

> damn dog's sh!t as soon as he does it.....



Not just in East Dulwich.


We walked to the Square and Compass in Worth Matravers (Dorset) a week or so back, with family, including kids. Just off the cliff path.


Lovely old pub with a hatch for a bar, a strange fossil museum attached, and equally lovely green space in front for the kids to run about and the adults to sit and drink ale and eat pasties.


Except - the grass was full of dog sh*t. All over the place. Due to the many many dogs, with owners who clearly weren't watching what their dogs were doing. Literally.


No bin for said sh*t.


Parents trying to keep their kids from running/walking/crawling in said sh*t.


Which reminds me, I meant to write to the pub. Yes the dog owners are to blame, but surely the pub could at least provide a bin and maybe bags?


It was disgusting.

Sorry I don't know the dog or owner.


I have, on many occasions, considered installing CCTV to catch evidence of cats and dogs pooing in my front garden. I have a life and consider myself to be responsible citizen and empathetic to others which unfortunately many people aren't on this forum; people who feel the need to insult others unnecessarily.


I don't have any pets but they migrate to my garden to deposit their mess (and leave cat hairs on my outdoor sofa). Grrrr No I do not want to clear up dog or cat mess- even if it is easy to do with soap and water. I've had to do it so many times (and retched as I was doing it). That is not enhancing my life!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...