Jump to content

Recommended Posts

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SUGGESTION. Try a bit of `rodeo sex`. Take her

> from behind and, holding on tightly to her jugs,

> call her by the wrong name. See how long you can

> `stay mounted` for .



And have all your mates hiding in the wardrobe ready to jump out and chant ?rodeo rodeo rodeo? until you?re kicked off, stabbed and burnt alive.

Taking someone to a restaurant to finish them is way too stressful and raises expectations of a nice evening out. Do it in a cafe, during the day and go down the "subtle honesty" route.


Sorry utter boring response, I suppose you could always kill yourself and then you wouldnt have to put yourself through it.

Sheepdog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which restaurant would people suggest is the best

> in ED for giving one's girlfriend the old

> heave-ho? Obviously one doesn't want to make it

> too expensive, or be so cathedral-quiet that

> people might notice a scene.


Hmmm - not too expensive, not too quiet. When is her birthday? Could you string it out a bit longer perhaps ( but def before Christmas)?


So far, I'm going with the Actress. You might get a nice pizza (with gourmet toppings) and a tumbler of wine thrown in your face. But at least its not deathly quiet. There are also some decent looking blokes in there so she might meet someone new.


Alternatively, your girlfriend might be deliberately treating you like cr@p (in the hope that you are the one forced to do the dumping, or binning as you say). If that's the case I would suggest somewhere way more pricey, as long as you were paying.

waynetta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh tictac I see what you did there.When you said

> she had top tips what you meant was top tits.

> Very clever. A hole in one in golfing parlance.


Oh Waynetta - Im sure you have got me alllllll wrong there....

Motto


Never bin your girlfriend unless you have another one lined up.


I suspect this devious bugge* has one already sorted.


Girls used to do this to me all the time. I have cried, I have screamed, I have kicked ankles under the table and I have thrown wine (at some very ugly girls in my time) they just don't know when they are well off. I visit them on facebook regularly to watch them in their sad single unhappy regretful existence. Poor things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...