Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks all for the recommendation. can I ask, did you all go for the premium package or did you find the basic one sufficient? I guess much depends on the child's behaviour and your needs etc but still interesting to know. I'm thinking we can just do the basic...

We actually used her twice (same child but two years apart and v different problems). The first time we went for the premium package and it was great. Definitely what we needed and really useful to have the ongoing support throughout the few weeks we were implementing the plan.


The second time, we just felt that we wanted to tweak a few things - we already had a child who generally slept well at this point and I felt like I just needed a bit of guidance as he was much older with a few new challenges. In that case we went for the basic package and it was definitely sufficient because we were already familiar with Nicola's methods.


On both occasions, she was happy to have the consultation before we committed to the package and with the basic package there was potential to 'upgrade' if we felt we needed it.


As you say, it will probably depend on your specific needs but I'm sure nicola would be open to a chat about what's best - and I'm confident she won't just advise the expensive option for the sake of it!

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...